Bspec mentions 50 us for IO wake time and 32 us for fast wake time. 32 us
is most probably wrong as it doesn't meet the specification as fast wake
time is calculated in Bspec like this:
10..16 us (precharge) + 8 us (preamble) + 4 us (phy_wake) + 20 us
(tfw_exit_latency)
Instead of using these constants calculate IO wake and fast wake for
DISPLAY_VER < 12 as well.
v3:
- do not handle < 9 separately
- add own helper for skl and tgl io buffer wake times
v2:
- initialize io/fast_wake_time for display version < 9
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240313133221.868391-4-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Current fast and IO wake lines calculation is assuming fast wake sync
length is 18 pulses. Let's improve this by checking actual length.
Add getter for IO buffer wake time and return 10 us there which was assumed
with static 42 us IO wake time. Upcoming patches will extent this for
different display versions.
Bspec: 65450
v3:
- s/get_io_buffer_wake_time/io_buffer_wake_time/ and use it directly in
calculation.
v2:
- rename io_wake_time in if block to io_buffer_wake_time
- rename get_io_wake_time to get_io_buffer_wake_time
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240313133221.868391-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Move psr_init_dpcd() from init-connector to connector-detect
function. The dpcd probe for checking panel replay capability
for external dp connector is causing delay during boot which can
be optimized by moving dpcd probe to connector specific detect().
v1: Initial version.
v2: Add details in commit description. [Jani]
Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/10284
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Fixes: cceeaa312d ("drm/i915/panelreplay: Enable panel replay dpcd initialization for DP")
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240229043716.4065760-1-animesh.manna@intel.com
ALPM Entry Check represents the number of lines needed to put the main link
to sleep and keep it in the sleep state before it can be taken out of the
SLEEP state (eDP requires the main link to be in the SLEEP state for a
minimum of 5us).
Bspec: 71477
v2: move display version check into _lnl_compute_alpm_param
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240130111130.3298779-4-jouni.hogander@intel.com
On HSW non-ULT (or at least on Dell Latitude E6540) external displays
start to flicker when we enable PSR on the eDP. We observe a much higher
SR and PC6 residency than should be possible with an external display,
and indeen much higher than what we observe with eDP disabled and
only the external display enabled. Looks like the hardware is somehow
ignoring the fact that the external display is active during PSR.
I wasn't able to redproduce this on my HSW ULT machine, or BDW.
So either there's something specific about this particular laptop
(eg. some unknown firmware thing) or the issue is limited to just
non-ULT HSW systems. All known registers that could affect this
look perfectly reasonable on the affected machine.
As a workaround let's unmask the LPSP event to prevent PSR entry
except while in LPSP mode (only pipe A + eDP active). This
will prevent PSR entry entirely when multiple pipes are active.
The one slight downside is that we now also prevent PSR entry
when driving eDP with pipe B or C, but I think that's a reasonable
tradeoff to avoid having to implement a more complex workaround.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 783d8b8087 ("drm/i915/psr: Re-enable PSR1 on hsw/bdw")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/10092
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240118212131.31868-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
MST connectors don't have a static attached encoder, as their encoder
can change depending on the pipe they use; so the encoder for an MST
connector can't be retrieved using intel_dp_attached_encoder() (which
may return NULL for MST). Most of the PSR debugfs entries depend on a
static connector -> encoder mapping which is only true for eDP and SST
DP connectors and not for MST. These debugfs entries were enabled for
MST connectors as well recently to provide PR information for them, but
handling MST connectors needs more changes.
Fix this by not adding for now the PSR entries on MST connectors. To
make things more uniform add the entries for SST connectors on all
platforms, not just on platforms supporting DP2.0.
v2:
- Keep adding the entries for SST connectors. (Jouni)
- Add a TODO: comment for MST support.
Fixes: ef75c25e8f ("drm/i915/panelreplay: Debugfs support for panel replay")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/9850
Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240103152609.2434100-1-imre.deak@intel.com
Colorimetry support is not really a PSR specific thing. Move it to intel_dp
struct and use it also when preparing vsc sdp for non-PSR case.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Tested-by: Shawn Lee <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231220103609.1384523-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Use the >= and < operators for the DISPLAY_VER checks everywhere.
This is what most of the code does, but especially recently random
pieces of code have started doing this differently for no good reason.
Conversion done with the following cocci:
@find@
expression i915;
constant ver;
@@
(
DISPLAY_VER(i915) <= ver
|
DISPLAY_VER(i915) > ver
)
@script:python inc@
old_ver << find.ver;
new_ver;
@@
coccinelle.new_ver = str(int(old_ver) + 1)
@@
expression find.i915;
constant find.ver;
identifier inc.new_ver;
@@
(
- DISPLAY_VER(i915) <= ver
+ DISPLAY_VER(i915) < new_ver
|
- DISPLAY_VER(i915) > ver
+ DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= new_ver
)
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231127145028.4899-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Currently we are enabling selective fetch for all planes that are visible.
This is suboptimal as we might be fetching for memory for planes that are
not part of selective update.
Fix this by adding proper handling for disabling plane selective fetch:
If plane previously part of selective update is now not part of update:
Add it into updated planes and let the plane configuration to disable
selective fetch for it.
v3: Checkpatch warnings fixed
v2:
- Add setting sel_fetch_area->y1/y2 to -1
- Remove setting again local sel_fetch_area variable
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231120082606.3156488-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Currently selective fetch configuration for planes is implemented in psr
code. More suitable place for this code is where everything else is
configured for planes -> move it into skl_universal_plane.c and
intel_cursor.c. This also allows us to drop hooks for cursor handling.
v3: Checkpatch warnings fixed
v2: Removed setting sel_fetch_area->y1/y2 as -1
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231120082606.3156488-2-jouni.hogander@intel.com
entry_setup_frames variable is defined as u8. However, the
function call intel_psr_entry_setup_frames() can return
negative error code. There is a type mismatch here, so let's
switch to use int here as well.
Fixes: 2b981d57e4 ("drm/i915/display: Support PSR entry VSC packet to be transmitted one frame earlier")
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231116090512.480373-1-mika.kahola@intel.com
Add debugfs support which will print source and sink status
per connector basis. Existing i915_psr_status and
i915_psr_sink_status will be used to get the source and
sink status of panel replay.
v1: Initial version. [rb-ed by Arun]
v2: Added check for DP 2.0 and connector type in connector_debugfs_add().
v3: Optimization and cosmetic changes. [Jouni]
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231108072303.3414118-7-animesh.manna@intel.com
At least one TGL had regression when using u8 types
for entry setup frames calculation. So, let's switch
to use ints instead.
intel_psr_entry_setup_frames() function expects
to return u8 but since in case of error the error
code -ETIME is returned. This doesn't fit into u8
and hence the return value is not as expected.
Fixes: 2b981d57e4 ("drm/i915/display: Support PSR entry VSC packet to be transmitted one frame earlier")
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231113093737.358137-1-mika.kahola@intel.com
TRANS_DP2_CTL register is programmed to enable panel replay from source
and sink is enabled through panel replay dpcd configuration address.
Bspec: 1407940617
v1: Initial version.
v2:
- Use pr_* flags instead psr_* flags. [Jouni]
- Remove intel_dp_is_edp check as edp1.5 also has panel replay. [Jouni]
v3: Cover letter updated and selective fetch condition check is added
before updating its bit in PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL register. [Jouni]
v4: Selective fetch related PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL programmming dropped. [Jouni]
v5: Added PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL programming as needed for Continuous Full
Frame (CFF) update.
v6: Rebased on latest.
Note: Initial plan is to enable panel replay in full-screen live active
frame update mode. In a incremental approach panel replay will be enabled
in selctive update mode if there is any gap in curent implementation.
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231108072303.3414118-6-animesh.manna@intel.com
Due to similarity panel replay dpcd initialization got added in psr
function which is specific for edp panel. This patch enables panel
replay initialization for dp connector.
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231108072303.3414118-5-animesh.manna@intel.com
Modify existing PSR implementation to enable panel replay feature of DP 2.0
which is similar to PSR feature of EDP panel. There is different DPCD
address to check panel capability compare to PSR and vsc sdp header
is different.
v1: Initial version.
v2:
- Set source_panel_replay_support flag under HAS_PANEL_REPLAY()
condition check. [Jouni]
- Code restructured around intel_panel_replay_init
and renamed to intel_panel_replay_init_dpcd. [Jouni]
- Remove the initial code modification around has_psr2 flag. [Jouni]
- Add CAN_PANEL_REPLAY() in intel_encoder_can_psr which is used to
enable in intel_psr_post_plane_update. [Jouni]
v3:
- Initialize both psr and panel-replay. [Jouni]
- Initialize both panel replay and psr if detected. [Jouni]
- Refactoring psr function by introducing _psr_compute_config(). [Jouni]
- Add check for !is_edp while deriving source_panel_replay_support. [Jouni]
- Enable panel replay dpcd initialization in a separate patch. [Jouni]
v4:
- HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() check not needed during sink capability check. [Jouni]
- Set either panel replay source support or psr. [Jouni]
v5:
- HAS_PANEL_REPLAY() removed and use HAS_DP20() instead. [Jouni]
- Move psr related code to intel_psr.c. [Jani]
- Reset sink_panel_replay_support flag during disconnection. [Jani]
v6: return statement restored which is removed by misatke. [Jouni]
v7: cosmetic changes. [Arun]
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231108072303.3414118-4-animesh.manna@intel.com
This patch is preparing adding panel replay specific dpcd init.
Cc: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231108072303.3414118-3-animesh.manna@intel.com
Display driver shall read DPCD 00071h[3:1] during configuration
to get PSR setup time. This register provides the setup time
requirement on the VSC SDP entry packet. If setup time cannot be
met with the current timings
(e.g., PSR setup time + other blanking requirements > blanking time),
driver should enable sending VSC SDP one frame earlier before sending
the capture frame.
BSpec: 69895 (PSR Entry Setup Frames 17:16)
v2: Write frames before su entry to correct register (Ville, Jouni)
Move frames before su entry calculation to it's
own function (Ville, Jouni)
Rename PSR Entry Setup Frames register to indicate
Lunarlake specificity (Jouni)
v3: Modify setup entry frames calculation function to
return the actual frames (Ville)
Match comment with actual implementation (Jouni)
v4: Drop "set" from function naming (Jouni, Ville)
Use i915 instead of dev_priv (Jouni)
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231106114228.146574-1-mika.kahola@intel.com
Move psr related module parameters under display. Also fix error in
enable_psr2_sel_fetch module parameter descrtiption. It was saying disabled
by default while it's vice versa. Also psr_safest_params was missing
default value in description. This is now added.
v2:
- Fix enable_psr2_sel_fetch description.
- Add default value into psr_safest_params description.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231024124109.384973-5-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Watchdog timers for Lunarlake HW were removed for PSR/PSR2
The patch removes the use of these timers from the driver code.
BSpec: 69895
v2: Reword commit message (Ville)
Drop HPD mask from LNL (Ville)
Revise masking logic (Jouni)
v3: Revise commit message (Ville)
Revert HPD mask removal as irrelevant for this patch (Ville)
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231010095233.590613-1-mika.kahola@intel.com
intel_psr_pre_plane_update() operates on a per-crtc level, whereas
intel_psr_post_plane_update() operates on the whole atomic commit,
for no real reason that I can see. Adjust intel_psr_post_plane_update()
to match the intel_psr_pre_plane_update() approach.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231004155607.7719-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Normally PSR errors detected by the panel are triggering HPD interrupt and
seen as error in dmesg. Some panels are not triggering the interrupt even
it is requested and they are detecting error. Due to this it would be good
to have possibility to check panel detected errors. Add PSR error status
into PSR sink status debugfs interface.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230828083107.1520501-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
We are planning to move flush performed from work queue. This
means it is possible to have invalidate -> flip -> flush sequence.
Handle this by clearing possible busy bits on flip.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230901093500.3463046-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Split out frontbuffer related declarations and static inlines from
gem/i915_gem_object.h into new gem/i915_gem_object_frontbuffer.h.
The main goal is to reduce header interdependencies. With
gem/i915_gem_object.h including display/intel_frontbuffer.h,
modification of the latter causes a whopping 300+ objects to be rebuilt,
while many of the source files actually needing it aren't explicitly
including it at all.
After the change, only 21 objects depend on display/intel_frontbuffer.h,
directly or indirectly.
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230830085127.2416842-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Stepping-specific display behavior shouldn't be tied to MTL as a
platform, but rather specifically to the Xe_LPD+ IP. Future non-MTL
platforms may re-use this IP and will need to follow the exact same
logic and apply the same workarounds. IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP() is dropped
in favor of a new macro IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP() that only checks the
display IP version.
v2:
- Rename macro to IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP for consistency with the
corresponding GT macro and handle steppings the same way.
v3:
- Drop the automatic "STEP_" pasting.
v4:
- Implement IS_DISPLAY_IP_STEP on top of IS_DISPLAY_IP_RANGE /
IS_DISPLAY_STEP building blocks and make the parameters from/until
instead of begin/fixed. (Jani)
- Fix usage details in comment.
v5:
- Tweak macro comment. (Gustavo)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230821180619.650007-17-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Driver refers to the platform Alderlake P as ADLP in places
and ALDERLAKE_P in some. Making the consistent change
to avoid confusion of the right naming convention for
the platform.
v2:
- Unrolled wrapper IS_ADLP_GRAPHICS_STEP and Replace
- Added IS_ALDERLAKE_P() && IS_GRAPHICS_STEP() (Jani/Tvrtko).
v3:
- Removed unused macros of display steps.
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dnyaneshwar Bhadane <dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230801135344.3797924-11-dnyaneshwar.bhadane@intel.com
Encoder compute config is changing hw.adjusted mode. Uapi.adjusted mode
doesn't get updated before psr compute config gets called. This causes io
and fast wake line calculation using adjusted mode containing values before
encoder adjustments. Fix this by using hw.adjusted mode instead of
uapi.adjusted mode.
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/8475
Fixes: cb42e8ede5 ("drm/i915/psr: Use calculated io and fast wake lines")
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230620111745.2870706-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
hsw/bdw lack the pipe register vs. display register distinction
in their PSR masking capabilities. So to keep our CURSURFLIVE
tricks working we need to just unmask all display register writes
on these platforms. The downside being that any display regitster
(eg. even SWF regs) will cause a PSR exit.
Note that WaMaskMMIOWriteForPSR asks us to mask this on bdw, but
that won't work since we need those CURSURFLIVE tricks. Observations
on actual hardware show that this causes one extra PSR exit ~every
10 seconds, which is pretty much irrelevant. I suspect this is
due to the pcode poking at IPS_CTL. Disabling IPS does not stop it
however, so either I'm wrong or pcode pokes at the register
regardless of whether it's actually trying to enable/disable IPS.
Also when the machine is busy (eg. just running 'find /') these
extra PSR exits cease, which again points at pcode or some other
PM entity as being the culprit.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230609141404.12729-11-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reintroduce the special PSR AUX CH setup for hsw/bdw. Not all
of it was even removed (BDW AUX data registers were left behind).
Update the code to use REG_BIT() & co. while at it.
v2: Define the SRD_AUX_CTL bits in terms of DP_AUX_CTL bits (Jouni)
Add a comment explaining the hand rolled DPCD write (Jouni)
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230609141404.12729-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
In preparation for re-introducing HSW's different PSR1 register
offeets let's just wrap all the registers into functions.
Avoids having to make the register macros more complex.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230609141404.12729-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
In order to avoid flush_scheduled_work() usage, add a dedicated
workqueue in the drm_i915_private structure. In this way, we don't
need to use the system queue anymore.
This change is mostly mechanical and based on Tetsuo's original
patch[1].
v6 by Jani:
- Also create unordered_wq for mock device
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/114608/ [1]
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/c816ebe17ef08d363981942a096a586a7658a65e.1686231190.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Reduce the 'intel_dp' stuff a bit by introducing local
cpu_transcoder variables.
Ideally I'd like the whole PSR code to stop using intel_dp
except during a full modeset, but dunno yet if that's
possible. But the less 'intel_dp' we have sprad around
the easier that should be to figure out eventually.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230411191429.29895-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
The fact that DC states reset the PSR perofrmance counter
is no reason not to include it in the debug output.
But let's keep the comment there to remind people about
that caveat.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230411191429.29895-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Define more of the PSR mask bits, and describe in detail
what some of them do. Even if we don't set them all from
the driver they can be very useful during PSR debugging.
Having to trawl through bspec every time to find them is
not fun, and re-reverse engineering the behaviour every
time is time consuming (even if a bit more fun than spec
trawling).
v2: Moar bits
Put the description into a comment to be easily available
v2: Fix the BDW_UNMASK_VBL_TO_REGS_IN_SRD/HSW_UNMASK_VBL_TO_REGS_IN_SRD
description
Rebase due to intel_psr_regs.h
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230411191429.29895-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
If we have to force the hardware to go through a full modeset
due to eg. cdclk reprogramming, we need to preserve
crtc_state->inherited for all crtcs that have not otherwise
gone through the whole compute_config() stuff after connectors
have been detected.
Otherwise eg. cdclk induced modeset glk_force_audio_cdclk()
will clear the inherited flag, and thus the first real commit
coming from userspace later on will not be forced through
the full .compute_config() path and so eg. audio state may
not get properly recomputed.
But instead of adding all kinds of ad-hoc crtc_state->inherited
preservation hacks all over, let's change things so that we
only clear it for the crtcs directly included in userspace/client
initiated commits.
Should be far less fragile since now we just need to remember
to flag the internal commits, and not worry about where new
crtcs might get pulled in.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5260
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230328122357.1697-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Ensure vblank >= psr2 vblank
where
Psr2 vblank = PSR2_CTL Block Count Number maximum line count.
Bspec: 71580, 49274
v2: Use calculated block count number maximum line count
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230329150703.432072-6-jouni.hogander@intel.com
PSR WM optimization should be disabled based on any wm level being
disabled. Also same WA should be applied for ICL as well.
Bspec: 71580
v5:
- Set in pre plane hook and clear in post plane hook
v4:
- Handle mode change in psr enable/disable
- Handle wm_level_disable changes separately in pre plane hook
v3:
- Split patch
v2:
- set/clear chicken bit in post_plane_update
- apply for ICL as well
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230329150703.432072-4-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Wa_16013835468 is a separate from Wa_14015648006 and needs to be
applied for display version 12. Fix this by removing all the
references to Wa_14015648006 and apply Wa_16013835468 according to
Bspec.
Also move workaround into separate function as a preparation for
Wa_14015648006 implementation.
Bspec: 55378
v3:
- apply for display version 12 only
v2:
- keep applying the wa in intel_psr_enable_source
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230329150703.432072-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
There's only one reference to the struct intel_dmc members dc_state,
target_dc_state, and allowed_dc_mask within intel_dmc.c, begging the
question why they are under struct intel_dmc to begin with.
Moreover, the only references to i915->display.dmc outside of
intel_dmc.c are to these members.
They don't belong. Move them from struct intel_dmc to struct
i915_power_domains, which seems like a more suitable place.
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230301122944.1298929-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Currently we are using hardcoded 7 for io and fast wake lines.
According to Bspec io and fast wake times are both 42us for
DISPLAY_VER >= 12 and 50us and 32us for older platforms.
Calculate line counts for these and configure them into PSR2_CTL
accordingly
Use 45 us for the fast wake calculation as 42 seems to be too
tight based on testing.
Bspec: 49274, 4289
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Fixes: 64cf40a125 ("drm/i915/psr: Program default IO buffer Wake and Fast Wake")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/7725
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230221085304.3382297-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
The PSR code has no business mucking around with the
vblank delay. Currently nothing that depends on knowing
the exact vblank start scanline (eg. vblank evasion)
is aware of this and so will not work correctly.
The w/a seems to be for pre-production hw only, so let's
just nuke it.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230213225258.2127-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Name the CPU transcoder timing registers TRANS_FOO rather than
just FOO. This is the modern name, after the pipe/transcoder split
happened. Makes it a bit more obvious whether you pass in a pipe or
a transcoder.
PIPESRC is a bit special as it's a pipe register, even though it
lives in the transcoder registers range (0x60000 instead of 0x70000).
And BCLRPAT I suppose is a transcoder register (since it has something
to do with the timing generator), but it doesn't even exist after gen4
so I left it to use the only name it ever had in bspec.
And while at it let's pass in the correct enum in few more
places why don't we. Although in all those places the distinction
doesn't matter.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230213225258.2127-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Several post-TGL platforms have been brought up now, so we're well past
the point where we usually drop the workarounds that are only applicable
to internal/pre-production hardware.
Production TGL hardware always has display stepping C0 or later and GT
stepping B0 or later (this is true for both the original TGL and the U/Y
subplatform).
Bspec 44455
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230127224313.4042331-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
SEL_FETCH_CTL registers are armed immediately when plane is disabled.
SEL_FETCH_* instances of plane configuration are used when doing
selective update and normal plane register instances for full updates.
Currently all SEL_FETCH_* registers are written as a part of noarm
plane configuration. If noarm and arm plane configuration are not
happening within same vblank we may end up having plane as a part of
selective update before it's PLANE_SURF register is written.
Fix this by splitting plane selective fetch configuration into arm and
noarm versions and call them accordingly. Write SEL_FETCH_CTL in arm
version.
v3:
- add arm suffix into intel_psr2_disable_plane_sel_fetch
v2:
- drop color_plane parameter from arm part
- dev_priv -> i915 in arm part
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230130080651.3796929-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Add 4th pipe and extend TGL Wa_16013835468 to support ADLP, MTL and
DG2 and all TGL steppings.
BSpec: 54369, 55378, 66624
v3:
- commit message modified
v2:
- apply for PSR1 as well
- remove stepping information from comments
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230105065637.2063311-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Currently we are observing occasionally display flickering or complete
freeze. This is narrowed down to be caused by single full frame update
(SFF).
SFF bit after it's written gets cleared by HW in subsequent vblank
i.e. when the update is sent to the panel. SFF bit is required to be
written together with partial frame update (PFU) bit. After the SFF
bit gets cleared by the HW psr2 man trk ctl register still contains
PFU bit. If there is subsequent update for any reason we will end up
having selective update/fetch configuration where start line is 0 and
end line is 0. Also selective fetch configuration for the planes is
not properly performed. This seems to be causing problems with some
panels.
Using CFF without SFF doesn't work either because it may happen that
psr2 man track ctl register is overwritten by next update before
vblank triggers sending the update. This is causing problems to
psr_invalidate/flush. Using CFF and SFF together solves the problems
as SFF is cleared only by HW in subsequent vblank and the update gets
sent.
Fix the flickering/freeze issue by keeping CFF bit as set when PSR2 is
enabled unless there is a properly configured selective update via
atomic commit.
v2:
- Improve commit message and comments
- No functional changes
This is also workaround for HSD 14014971508
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reported-by: Lee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Tested-by: Lee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221201072308.1905679-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
This patch introduces initial workarounds for mtl platform
v2: switch IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP to use IS_METEORLAKE from testing display
ver. (Tvrtko)
v3: clerical issues, extend 16015201720 to mtl. (MattR)
v4: make sure 16015201720 includes display 13. (MattR)
Bspec: 66624
Signed-off-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221209220543.502047-1-matthew.s.atwood@intel.com
Turns out many of the files that need i915_reg.h get it implicitly via
{display/intel_de.h, gt/intel_context.h} -> i915_trace.h -> i915_irq.h
-> i915_reg.h. Since i915_trace.h doesn't actually need i915_irq.h,
makes sense to drop it, but that requires adding quite a few new
includes all over the place.
Prefer including i915_reg.h where needed instead of adding another
implicit include, because eventually we'll want to split up i915_reg.h
and only include the specific registers at each place.
Also some places actually needed i915_irq.h too.
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/6e78a2e0ac1bffaf5af3b5ccc21dff05e6518cef.1668008071.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Selective update area is now aligned with DSC slice height when
DSC is enabled. Remove inappropriate warning about missing DSC
alignment.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Fixes: 47d4ae2192 ("drm/i915/mtl: Extend PSR support")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/7212
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221102174544.2288205-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Do not enable psr2 if panel ganularity is not aligned with DSC slice
height when DSC is enabled
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221102174544.2288205-2-jouni.hogander@intel.com
MTL shares PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL bits with ADL. Currently some bit
getter functions are incorrect for MTL. This patch fixes those.
Bspec: 49274
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Fixes: 47d4ae2192 ("drm/i915/mtl: Extend PSR support")
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221101115342.1136720-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Currently we are observing mouse cursor stuttering when using
xrandr --scaling=1.2x1.2. X scaling/transformation seems to be
doing fronbuffer rendering. When moving mouse cursor X seems to
perform several invalidates and only one DirtyFB. I.e. it seems
to be assuming updates are sent to panel while drawing is done.
Earlier we were disabling PSR in frontbuffer invalidate call back
(when drawing in X started). PSR was re-enabled in frontbuffer
flush callback (dirtyfb ioctl). This was working fine with X
scaling/transformation. Now we are just enabling continuous full
frame (cff) in PSR invalidate callback. Enabling cff doesn't
trigger any updates. It just configures PSR to send full frame
when updates are sent. I.e. there are no updates on screen before
PSR flush callback is made. X seems to be doing several updates
in frontbuffer before doing dirtyfb ioctl.
Fix this by sending single update on every invalidate callback.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Fixes: 805f04d42a ("drm/i915/display/psr: Use continuos full frame to handle frontbuffer invalidations")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6679
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reported-by: Brian J. Tarricone <brian@tarricone.org>
Tested-by: Brian J. Tarricone <brian@tarricone.org>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221024054649.31299-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Meteorlake and display 14 platform don't have any PSR differences
when comparing to Alderlake-P display, so it was only necessary to
extend some checks to properly program hardware.
BSpec: 55229, 49196
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220907081543.92268-1-mika.kahola@intel.com
Current PSR code is supposed to use TRANSCODER_EDP to force 0 shift for
bits in PSR_IMR/IIR registers:
/*
* gen12+ has registers relative to transcoder and one per transcoder
* using the same bit definition: handle it as TRANSCODER_EDP to force
* 0 shift in bit definition
*/
At the time of writing the code assumption "TRANSCODER_EDP == 0" was made.
This is not the case and all fields in PSR_IMR and PSR_IIR are shifted
incorrectly if DISPLAY_VER >= 12.
Fix this by adding separate register field defines for >=12 and add bit
getter functions to keep code readability.
v4:
- Remove EDP from TGL definitions (José)
- Use REG_BIT and REG_GENMASK (José)
v3:
- Add separate register field defines (José)
- Add bit getter functions (José)
v2:
- Improve commit message (José)
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Fixes: 8241cfbe67 ("drm/i915/tgl: Access the right register when handling PSR interruptions")
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221003072011.72408-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Use existing drm_atomic_helper_damage_merged from generic drm code
instead of implementing own loop to iterate over damage_clips.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220823112920.352563-4-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
drm_plane_state->src is modified when offset is calculated:
before calculation:
src.x1 = 8192, src.y1 = 8192
after calculation (pitch = 65536, cpp = 4, alignment = 262144)
src.x1 = 8192, src.y1 = 0, offset = 0x20000000
Damage clips are relative to original coodrdinates provided by
user-space. To compare these against src coordinates we need to use
original coordinates as provided by user-space. These can be obtained
by using drm_plane_state_src.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220823112920.352563-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Selective update doesn't work if SU start address is 0 and start/end
SDP is configured to be sent prior to SU start/end lines. PSR2 has to be
disabled in this case for Alder Lake.
HSDES: 22012279113
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220905102355.176622-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Equation for sending start/end SDP prior to the SU region start/end
has changed. Update used formula.
Bspec: 49274
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220905102355.176622-2-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
The issue here was on for_each_intel_encoder_mask_with_psr() over the
new_crtc_state encoder mask, so if the CRTC was being disabled mask
would be zero and it would not have any chance to disable PSR.
So here doing for_each_intel_encoder_mask_with_psr() over the
old_crtc_state encoder mask and then using the new_crtc_state to
check if PSR needs to be disabled.
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220714150755.154985-2-jose.souza@intel.com
This patches fixes a issue but not in the right way as
for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state() will interate over all CRTCs
not only the crtc passed as parameter, also this two for_each loops
are not necessary and only make code harder to understand.
Proper fix will be discussed in the next patch.
This reverts commit 75f664903d.
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220714150755.154985-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Currently PSR is left enabled when all planes are disabled if there
is no attached encoder in new state. This seems to be causing FIFO
underruns.
Fix this by checking if encoder exists in new crtc state and disable
PSR if it doesn't.
v2: Unify disable logic with existing
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reported-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220711111750.881552-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Commit 3cf0507625 ("drm/i915/bios: Split VBT data into per-panel vs.
global parts") cause PSR to be disabled when enable_psr has the
default value and there is at least one DP port that do not supports
PSR.
That was happening because intel_psr_init() is called for every DP
port and then enable_psr is globaly set to 0 based on the PSR support
of the DP port.
Here dropping the enable_psr overwritten and using the VBT PSR value
when enable_psr is set as default.
Fixes: 3cf0507625 ("drm/i915/bios: Split VBT data into per-panel vs. global parts")
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220608203344.513082-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Move the panel specific VBT parsing to happen during the
output probing stage. Needs to be done because the VBT
parsing will need to look at the EDID to determine
the correct panel_type on some machines.
We split the parsed VBT data (i915->vbt) along the same
boundary. For the moment we just hoist all the panel
specific stuff into connector->panel.vbt since that seems
like the most convenient place for eg. the backlight code.
Note that we simply drop the drrs type check from
intel_drrs_frontbuffer_update() since that operates on the whole
device rather than a specific connector/encoder. But the check
was just a micro optimization so removing it doesn't actually
mattter for correctness.
TODO: Lot's of cleanup to be done in the future. Eg. most of
the DSI stuff could probably be eliminated entirely and just
parsed on demand during DSI init.
v2: Note the intel_drrs_frontbuffer_update() change
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220510104242.6099-13-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Current update area calculation is not handling situation where
e.g. cursor plane is fully or partially outside pipe area.
Fix this by checking damage area against pipe_src area using
drm_rect_intersect.
v2: Set x1 and x2 in damaged_area initialization
v3: Move drm_rect_intersect into clip_area_update
v4: draw_area -> pipe_src
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5440
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220513142811.779331-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Currently we have some corner cases where area calculation fails. For
these sel fetch area calculation ends up having update area as y1 = 0,
y2 = 4. Instead of these values safer option is full update.
One of such for example is big fb with offset. We don't have usable
offset in psr2_sel_fetch_update. Currently it's open what is the
proper way to fix this corner case. Use full update for now.
v2: Commit message modified
v3: Print out debug info once when area calculation fails
v4: Use drm_info_once
v5: pipeA -> "pipe %c", pipe_name(crtc-pipe)
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220513142811.779331-2-jouni.hogander@intel.com
After commit 805f04d42a ("drm/i915/display/psr: Use continuos full
frame to handle frontbuffer invalidations") was merged we started to
get some drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, !(tmp & PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_ENABLE))
in tests that are executed in pipe B.
This is probably due psr2_sel_fetch_cff_enabled being left set during
PSR disable in the pipe A, so the PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL write in
intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() is skipped in pipe B and then
we get the warning when actually enabling PSR after planes programing.
We don't get such warnings when running tests in pipe A because
PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL is only cleared when enabling PSR2 with hardware
tracking.
Was not able to reproduce this issue but cleaning the PSR state
disable will not harm anything at all.
Fixes: 805f04d42a ("drm/i915/display/psr: Use continuos full frame to handle frontbuffer invalidations")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5634
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220414151118.21980-2-jose.souza@intel.com
If any of the PSR2 checks after intel_psr2_sel_fetch_config_valid()
fails, enable_psr2_sel_fetch will be kept enabled causing problems
in the functions that only checks for it and not for has_psr2.
So here moving the check that do not depend on enable_psr2_sel_fetch
and for the remaning ones jumping to a section that unset
enable_psr2_sel_fetch in case of failure to support PSR2.
Fixes: 6e43e276b8 ("drm/i915: Initial implementation of PSR2 selective fetch")
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220414151118.21980-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Instead of exit PSR when a frontbuffer invalidation happens, we can
enable the PSR2 selective fetch continuous full frame, that will keep
the panel updated like PSR was disabled but without keeping PSR active.
So as soon as the frontbuffer flush happens we can disable the
continuous full frame and start to do selective fetches much quicker
than the path that would enable PSR, that will wait a few frames
to actually activate PSR.
Also this approach has proven to fix some glitches found in Alderlake-P
when there are a lot of invalidations happening together with page
flips.
Some may ask why it is writing to CURSURFLIVE(), it is because
that is the way that hardware team provided us to poke display to
handle PSR updates, and it is being used since display 9.
v2:
- handling possible race conditions between frontbuffer rendering and
page flips
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Khaled Almahallawy <khaled.almahallawy@intel.com>
Cc: Shawn C Lee <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220405155344.47219-3-jose.souza@intel.com
Frontbuffer rendering and page flips can race with each other
and this can potentialy cause issues with PSR2 selective fetch.
And because pipe/crtc updates are time sentive we can't grab the
PSR lock after intel_pipe_update_start() and before
intel_pipe_update_end().
So here adding the lock and unlock functions and calls, the
proper PSR2 selective fetch handling will come in a separated patch.
v2:
- fixed new functions documentation
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220405155344.47219-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Following up what was done in commit 804f468853 ("drm/i915/psr: Set
"SF Partial Frame Enable" also on full update") and also setting
partial frame enable when psr_force_hw_tracking_exit() is called.
Also as PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL is a double buffered registers do a RMW
is not a good idea so here also setting the man_trk_ctl_enable_bit()
that is required in TGL and only doing a register write.
v2:
- not doing a rmw
v3:
- removing the inline from functions that return PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL
bits
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220405155344.47219-1-jose.souza@intel.com
If a error happens and sink_not_reliable is set, PSR should be disabled
for good but that is not happening.
It would be disabled by the function handling the PSR error but then
on the next fastset it would be enabled again in
_intel_psr_post_plane_update().
It would only be disabled for good in the next modeset where has_psr
will be set false.
v2:
- release psr lock before continue
Fixes: 9ce5884e51 ("drm/i915/display: Only keep PSR enabled if there is active planes")
Reported-by: Khaled Almahallawy <khaled.almahallawy@intel.com>
Reported-by: Charlton Lin <charlton.lin@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311185149.110527-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Some users are suffering with PSR2 issues that are under debug or
issues that were root caused to panel firmware bugs, to make life of
those users easier here adding a option to disable PSR2 with kernel
parameters so they can still benefit from PSR1 power savings.
Using the same enable_psr that is current used to turn the whole
feature on or off and allowing user to select up to what PSR version
it should enable.
Right now users only set this parameter to 0 when they want to disable
PSR1 and PSR2 or don't add it at all leaving it to per-chip behavior
so it should not cause a bad impact on users.
v2:
- changing enable_psr values (Ville and Rodrigo)
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/4951
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220224202523.993560-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Currently we are observing occasional screen flickering when
PSR2 selective fetch is enabled. More specifically glitch seems
to happen on full frame update when cursor moves to coords
x = -1 or y = -1.
According to Bspec SF Single full frame should not be set if
SF Partial Frame Enable is not set. This happened to be true for
ADLP as PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_ENABLE is always set and for ADL_P it's
actually "SF Partial Frame Enable" (Bit 31).
Setting "SF Partial Frame Enable" bit also on full update seems to
fix screen flickering.
Also make code more clear by setting PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_ENABLE
only if not on ADL_P. Bit 31 has different meaning in ADL_P.
Bspec: 49274
v2: Fix Mihai Harpau email address
v3: Modify commit message and remove unnecessary comment
Tested-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Fixes: 7f6002e580 ("drm/i915/display: Enable PSR2 selective fetch by default")
Reported-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Mihai Harpau <mharpau@gmail.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5077
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220225070228.855138-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Grouping inside of the same if all the programing sequences and
workarounds of PSR2.
The order of programing changed in intel_psr_enable_source() but
it will not affect PSR2 as at this point PSR2_ENABLE is still disabled.
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220210185223.95399-1-jose.souza@intel.com
When a plane with a multiplanar format is added to the state by
drm_atomic_add_affected_planes(), only the UV plane is
added, so a intel_atomic_get_new_plane_state() call to get the Y
plane state can return a null pointer.
To fix this, intel_atomic_get_plane_state() should be called and
the return needs to be checked for errors, as it could return a EAGAIN
as other atomic state could be holding the lock for the Y plane.
Other issue with the patch being fixed is that the Y plane is not
being committed to hardware because the corresponded plane bit is not
set in update_planes when UV and Y planes are added to the state by
drm_atomic_add_affected_planes().
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Fixes: 3809991ff5 ("drm/i915/display: Add initial selective fetch support for biplanar formats")
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211108213807.39865-1-jose.souza@intel.com
This reverts commit 1f61f0655b.
Now we are supporting selective fetch for biplanar formats.
We can revert WA patch which forced using full fetch for biplanar
formats.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211021101024.13112-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Biplanar formats are using two planes (Y and UV). This patch adds handling
of Y selective fetch area by utilizing existing linked plane mechanism.
Also UV plane Y offset configuration is modified according to Bspec.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211021101024.13112-2-jouni.hogander@intel.com
PSR2 is supported in transcoder A and B on Alderlake-P.
v2:
- explicity checking for transcoder A and B to avoid invalid transcoder
BSpec: 49185
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> # v1
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Hogander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com> # v2
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211027180545.55660-1-jose.souza@intel.com
PSR2 apparently requires some planes to be enabled for some
silly reason, and so we are now trying to turn PSR off before
planes go off. Except during a full modeset that is handled
less clearly through reorganization of the modeset sequence.
That is not great as it makes the code mode complex, and
prevents us from doing nice things such as just turning off
all the planes at the very start of the modeset. So let's
move the PSR pre_plane_update() thing to a spot where it
will handle both full modesets and everything else.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211022103304.24164-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Alderlake-P was getting 'max time under evasion' messages when PSR2
is enabled, this is due PIPE_SCANLINE/PIPEDSL returning 0 over a
period of time longer than VBLANK_EVASION_TIME_US.
For PSR1 we had the same issue so intel_psr_wait_for_idle() was
implemented to wait for PSR1 to get into idle state but nothing was
done for PSR2.
For PSR2 we can't only wait for idle state as PSR2 tends to keep
into sleep state(ready to send selective updates).
Waiting for any state below deep sleep proved to be effective in
avoiding the evasion messages and also not wasted a lot of time.
v2:
- dropping the additional wait_for loops, only the _wait_for_atomic()
is necessary
- waiting for states below EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_DEEP_SLEEP
v3:
- dropping intel_wait_for_condition_atomic() function
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211005231851.67698-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Right now the only user of psr_pause/resume is intel_cdclk but
additional users will be added in the future and we may need
do reference counting for PSR pause and resume, for now only adding a
warn_on so this cases do not go unnoticed.
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Hogander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211020003558.222198-2-jose.souza@intel.com
With all the recent fixes PSR2 is properly working in Alderlake-P but
due to some issues that don't have software workarounds it will not be
supported in display steppings older than B0.
Even with this patch PSR2 will no be enabled by default in ADL-P, it
still requires enable_psr2_sel_fetch to be set to true, what some
of our tests does.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930001409.254817-7-jose.souza@intel.com
The Wa_14014971508 is required to fix scanout when a feature that i915
do not support is enabled and this feature is not planned to be enabled
for adlp.
Keeping this workaround enabled can badly hurt power-savings when
a full frame fetch is required(see psr2_sel_fetch_plane_state_supported()
and psr2_sel_fetch_pipe_state_supported()).
Here a example that could badly hurt power-savings, userspace does
a page flip to a rotated plane, so CONTINUOS_FULL_FRAME set.
But then for a whole 30 seconds nothing in the screen requires updates
but because CONTINUOS_FULL_FRAME is set, it will not go into DC5/DC6.
Reverting Wa_14014971508 fixes that, as only a single frame will be
sent and then display can go to DC5/DC6 for those 30 seconds of
idleness.
BSpec: 54369
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930001409.254817-6-jose.souza@intel.com
Legacy cursor APIs are handled by intel_legacy_cursor_update(), that
calls drm_atomic_helper_update_plane() when going through the
slow/atomic path to update cursor, what was the case for PSR2
selective fetch.
drm_atomic_helper_update_plane() sets
drm_atomic_state->legacy_cursor_update to true when updating the
cursor plane, to allow several cursor updates to happen within the
same frame, as userspace does that.
If drivers waited for a vblank increment at the end of every cursor
movement that would cause a visible lag in the cursor.
But this optimization do not properly work with PSR2 selective fetch
dirt area calculation, for example if within a single frame the cursor
had 3 moves the final dirt area programmed to PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL would
be based in the second movement as old state and third movement as new
state, not updating the area where cursor was in the first state.
So here switching back to the fast path approach in
intel_legacy_cursor_update() and handling cursor movements as
frontbuffer rendering(psr_force_hw_tracking_exit()), that is not the
most optimal for power-savings but is the solution that we have until
mailbox style updates is implemented.
Also removing the cursor workaround as not it is properly undestand
the issue and is know that it will never cover all the cases.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930001409.254817-5-jose.souza@intel.com
When PSR2 selective fetch is enabled writes to CURSURFLIVE alone do
not causes the panel to be updated when doing frontbuffer rendering.
From what I was able to figure from experiments the writes to
CURSURFLIVE takes PSR2 from deep sleep but panel is not updated
because PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL has no start and end region set.
As we don't have the dirt area from current flush and invalidate API
and even if we did userspace could do several draws to frontbuffer and
we would need a way to append all the damaged areas of all the draws
that need to be part of next frame.
So here only programing PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL to do a single full frame
fetch.
It is a safe approach as if scanout is in the visible area
the single full frame will only be visible for hardware in the next
frame because of the double buffering, and if scanout is in vblank
area it will be draw in the current frame.
No need to disable PSR and wait a few miliseconds to enable it again.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930001409.254817-4-jose.souza@intel.com
We are still missing the PSR2 selective fetch handling of multi-planar
formats but until proper handle is added we can workaround it by
doing full frames fetch when state has such formats.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930001409.254817-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
PSR2 selective is not supported over rotated and scaled planes.
We had the rotation check in intel_psr2_sel_fetch_config_valid()
but that code path is only execute when a modeset is needed and
those plane parameters can change without a modeset.
Pipe selective fetch restrictions are also needed, it could be added
in intel_psr_compute_config() but pippe scaling is computed after
it is executed, so leaving as is for now.
There is no much loss in this approach as it would cause selective
fetch to not enabled as for alderlake-P and newer will cause it to
switch to PSR1 that will have the same power-savings as do full pipe
fetch.
Also need to check those restricions in the second
for_each_oldnew_intel_plane_in_state() loop because the state could
only have a plane that is not affected by those restricitons but
the damaged area intersect with planes that has those restrictions,
so a full pipe fetch is required.
v2:
- also handling pipe restrictions
BSpec: 55229
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> # v1
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930001409.254817-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Stop using HBR2/3 support as a proxy for TPS3/4 support.
The two are no longer 1:1 in the hardware, arguably they
never were due to HSW ULX which does support TPS3 while
being limited to HBR1.
In more recent times GLK gained support for TPS4 while
being limited to HBR2. And on CNL+ some ports support
HBR3 while others are limited to HBR2, but all ports
support TPS4.
v2: s/INTEL_GEN/DISPLAY_VER/
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210929162404.6717-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
PSR always had a requirement to only be enabled if there is active
planes but not following that never caused any issues.
But that changes in Alderlake-P, leaving PSR enabled without
active planes causes transcoder/port underruns.
Similar behavior was fixed during the pipe disable sequence by
commit 84030adb9e ("drm/i915/display: Disable audio, DRRS and PSR before planes").
intel_dp_compute_psr_vsc_sdp() had to move from
intel_psr_enable_locked() to intel_psr_compute_config() because we
need to be able to disable/enable PSR from atomic states without
connector and encoder state.
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210922215242.66683-3-jose.souza@intel.com
We were not completely following the selective fetch programming
sequence, here some things we were doing wrong:
- not programming plane selective fetch a PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL registers
when doing a modeset
- programming PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL out of vblank
With this changes the last remainig underrun found in Alderlake-P is
fixed.
Bspec: 55229
Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210922215242.66683-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Wa_16014451276 fixes the starting coordinate for PSR2 selective
updates. CHICKEN_TRANS definition of the workaround bit has a wrong
name based on workaround definition and HSD.
Wa_14014971508 allows the screen to continue to be updated when
coming back from DC5/DC6 and SF_SINGLE_FULL_FRAME bit is not kept
set in PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL.
Wa_16012604467 fixes underruns when exiting PSR2 when it is in one
of its internal states.
Wa_14014971508 is still in pending status in BSpec but by
the time this is reviewed and ready to be merged it will be finalized.
v2:
- renamed register to ADLP_1_BASED_X_GRANULARITY
- added comment about all ADL-P supported panels being 1 based X
granularity
BSpec: 54369
BSpec: 50054
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914212507.177511-5-jose.souza@intel.com
drm_atomic_helper_damage_iter_init() + drm_atomic_for_each_plane_damage()
returns the full plane area in case no damaged area was set by
userspace or it was discarted by driver.
This is important to fix the rendering of userspace applications that
does frontbuffer rendering and notify driver about dirty areas but do
not set any dirty clips.
With this we don't need to worry about to check and mark the whole
area as damaged in page flips.
Another important change here is the move of
drm_atomic_add_affected_planes() call, it needs to called late
otherwise the area of all the planes would be added to pipe_clip and
not saving power.
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914212507.177511-4-jose.souza@intel.com
Not sure why but when moving the cursor fast it causes some artifacts
of the cursor to be left in the cursor path, adding some pixels above
the cursor to the damaged area fixes the issue, so leaving this as a
workaround until proper fix is found.
This is reproducile on TGL and ADL-P.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914212507.177511-3-jose.souza@intel.com
BSpec states that the minimum number of frames before selective update
is 2, so making sure this minimum limit is fulfilled.
BSpec: 50422
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914212507.177511-2-jose.souza@intel.com
At this point is sure that HSW and BDW will never have PSR enabled by
default, so here dropping it from device info and cleaning up code.
v2:
- enable psr support for display 9
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210827174253.51122-1-jose.souza@intel.com
skl_calc_main_surface_offset() is used to calculate an aligned plane
surface address considering the inner framebuffer x and y offset.
It can not be used by selective fetch functions becase there is no
PLANE_SEL_FETCH_SURF.
So the PLANE_SEL_FETCH_OFFSET.y should only be PLANE_OFFSET.y +
damaged_area_within_plane.y1.
This fixes glitches seen in fbcon caused by typing something in
the terminal.
BSpec: 55229
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210815014346.373945-1-jose.souza@intel.com
The PSR enable/disable sequences now require that we program an extra
register in the PHY to adjust the lane disable power setting.
Bspec: 49274
Bspec: 53885
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210723174239.1551352-29-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Without this planes that were added by intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update()
that intersect with pipe damaged area will not
have skl_program_plane() and intel_psr2_program_plane_sel_fetch()
called, causing panel to not be properly updated.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210717011227.204494-2-jose.souza@intel.com
PSR2 is not supported on DG2.
Cc: Caz Yokoyama <Caz.Yokoyama@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210714031540.3539704-49-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Workarounds are documented in the bspec with an exclusive upper bound
(i.e., a "fixed" stepping that no longer needs the workaround). This
makes our driver's use of an inclusive upper bound for stepping ranges
confusing; the differing notation between code and bspec makes it very
easy for mistakes to creep in.
Let's switch the upper bound of our IS_{GT,DISP}_STEP macros over to use
an exclusive upper bound like the bspec does. This also has the benefit
of helping make sure workarounds are properly handled for new minor
steppings that show up (e.g., an A1 between the A0 and B0 we already
knew about) --- if the new intermediate stepping pulls in hardware fixes
early, there will be an update to the workaround definition which lets
us know we need to change our code. If the new stepping does not pull a
hardware fix earlier, then the new stepping will already be captured
properly by the "[begin, fix)" range in the code.
We'll probably need to be extra vigilant in code review of new
workarounds for the near future to make sure developers notice the new
semantics of workaround bounds. But we just migrated a bunch of our
platforms from the IS_REVID bounds over to IS_{GT,DISP}_STEP, so people
are already adjusting to the new macros and now is a good time to make
this change too.
[mattrope: Split out display changes to apply through intel-next tree]
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210717051426.4120328-8-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Implements changes around PSR for alderlake-P:
- EDP_SU_TRACK_ENABLE was removed and bit 30 now has other function
- Some bits of PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL moved and SF_PARTIAL_FRAME_UPDATE was
removed setting SU_REGION_START/END_ADDR will do this job
- SU_REGION_START/END_ADDR have now line granularity but will need to
be aligned with DSC when the PSRS + DSC support lands
BSpec: 50422
BSpec: 50424
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210625235600.765677-1-jose.souza@intel.com
The switch from old old IS_FOO_REVID() macros to the new table-based
IS_FOO_{GT,DISP}_STEP() macros is needed on both drm-intel-next (for
display-based DMC matching) and drm-intel-gt-next (for workaround
guards). To avoid conflicts, we'll apply the patches to a topic branch
and merge it to both intel branches to ensure the transition to the
new macros is clean.
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Most of the places are using this format so lets consolidate it.
v2:
- split patch in two: display and non-display because of conflicts
between drm-intel-gt-next x drm-intel-next
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210713003854.143197-1-jose.souza@intel.com
PSR2 is not compatible with DC3CO or VRR in this stepping, so not
enabling PSR2 if VRR will be enabled or not enabling DC3CO if PSR2 is
possible.
BSpec: 54369
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616203158.118111-5-jose.souza@intel.com
In some modes there is not enough time during hblank to transmit PSR2
SDP plus the pixels CRC SDP, if such case happens PSR2 needs to be
disabled.
But eDP spec 1.4b allows to transmit PSR2 SDP in a prior scanline
alone and than later the CRC SDP, allowing PSR2 to be enabled in
those hblank constrained modes.
BSpec: 49274
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616203158.118111-4-jose.souza@intel.com
The PSR2_CTL io buffer wake and fast wake values do not match
expected in pre production hardware, so here adding a table that
matches with HW to program it with values that HW expect.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616203158.118111-2-jose.souza@intel.com
We were only handling X and width granularity, what was causing issues
when sink had a granularity different than 4.
While at it, renaming su_x_granularity to su_w_granularity to better
match reality.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616203158.118111-1-jose.souza@intel.com
This introduces the following function that can exit and activate a psr
source when intel_psr is already enabled.
- intel_psr_pause(): Pause current PSR. It deactivates current psr state.
- intel_psr_resume(): Resume paused PSR. It activates paused psr state.
v2: Address Jose's review comment.
- Remove unneeded changes around the intel_psr_enable().
- Add intel_psr_post_exit() which processes waiting until PSR is idle
and WA for SelectiveFetch.
v3: Address Jose's review comment.
- Rename intel_psr_post_exit() to intel_psr_wait_exit_locked().
- Move WA_1408330847 to intel_psr_disable_locked()
- If the PSR is paused by an explicit intel_psr_paused() call, make the
intel_psr_flush() not to activate PSR.
v4: Address Jose's review comment.
- In order to avoid the scenario of PSR is not active but there is a
scheduled psr->work, it changes the check routine of intel_psr_pause()
for PSR's enablement from "psr->active" to "psr->enable".
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210608085415.515342-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
It removes intel_crtc_state from function argument of
intel_psr_enable_source() in order to use intel_psr_enable_source()
without intel_crtc_state on other psr internal functions.
And we can get cpu_trancoder from intel_psr, therefore we don't need to
pass intel_crtc_state to this function.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210526000656.3060314-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
We are missing the implementation of some workarounds to enabled PSR2
in Alderlake P, so to avoid any CI report of issues around PSR2
disabling it until all PSR2 workarounds are implemented.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Clint Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210524214805.259692-5-jose.souza@intel.com
DC3CO is allowed in all the combinations between pipe and port A and B
on alderlake-P.
BSpec: 49196
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Clint Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210524214805.259692-4-jose.souza@intel.com
In order to reuse code of PSR interrupt error check on other PSR functions,
it adds psr_interrupt_error_check() function.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210519000625.3184321-13-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
It replaces dc3co_enabled with dc3co_exitline on intel_psr struct. And
it saves dc3co_exitline, not dc3co_enabled, so we can use dc3co_exitline
without intel_crtc_state on other psr internal function like as
intel_psr_enable_source().
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210519000625.3184321-12-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
So far if we had a mismatch between the state asked and what was
programmed in hardware for PSR, this mismatch would go unnoticed.
So here adding the PSR to the hardware configuration readout,
EDP_PSR_CTL and EDP_PSR2_CTL can't be directly read because its state
flips due to other factors like frontbuffer modifications and CRC.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210418002126.87882-1-jose.souza@intel.com
The implementation of two workarounds are missing causing failures
in CI with pre-production HW.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210505213801.80772-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Hoist the intel_de.h include from intel_display_types.h one
level up. I need this in order to untangle the include order
so that I can add tracepoints into intel_de.h.
This little cocci script did most of the work for me:
@find@
@@
(
intel_de_read(...)
|
intel_de_read_fw(...)
|
intel_de_write(...)
|
intel_de_write_fw(...)
)
@has_include@
@@
(
#include "intel_de.h"
|
#include "display/intel_de.h"
)
@depends on find && !has_include@
@@
+ #include "intel_de.h"
#include "intel_display_types.h"
@depends on find && !has_include@
@@
+ #include "display/intel_de.h"
#include "display/intel_display_types.h"
Cc: Cooper Chiou <cooper.chiou@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210430143945.6776-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
TGL PSR2 hardware tracking shows momentary flicker and screen shift if
TGL Display stepping is B1 from A0.
It has been fixed from TGL Display stepping C0.
HSDES: 18015970021
HSDES: 2209313811
BSpec: 55378
v2: Add checking of PSR2 manual tracking (Jose)
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210422160544.2427123-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
EDP_Y_COORDINATE_ENABLE became a reserved register in display 13.
EDP_Y_COORDINATE_VALID have the same fate as EDP_Y_COORDINATE_ENABLE
but as we don't need it, removing the macro definition of it.
BSpec: 50422
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210421220224.200729-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Gen to ver conversions across the driver
The main change is Lucas' series [1], with Ville's GLK fixes [2] and a
cherry-pick of Matt's commit [3] from drm-intel-next as a base to avoid
conflicts.
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/88825/
[2] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/88938/
[3] 70bfb30743 ("drm/i915/display: Eliminate IS_GEN9_{BC,LP}")
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
# Conflicts:
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi_buf_trans.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/878s5ebny0.fsf@intel.com
Fix redundant condition, caught in cppcheck by kernel test robot.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Fixes: b64d6c5138 ("drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances")
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210409231738.238682-1-jose.souza@intel.com
While converting the rest of the driver to use GRAPHICS_VER() and
MEDIA_VER(), following what was done for display, some discussions went
back on what we did for display:
1) Why is the == comparison special that deserves a separate
macro instead of just getting the version and comparing directly
like is done for >, >=, <=?
2) IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() is weird in that it omits the "_VER" for
brevity. If we remove the current users of IS_DISPLAY_VER(), we
could actually repurpose it for a range check
With (1) there could be an advantage if we used gen_mask since multiple
conditionals be combined by the compiler in a single and instruction and
check the result. However a) INTEL_GEN() doesn't use the mask since it
would make the code bigger everywhere else and b) in the cases it made
sense, it also made sense to convert to the _RANGE() variant.
So here we repurpose IS_DISPLAY_VER() to work with a [ from, to ] range
like was the IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() and convert the current IS_DISPLAY_VER()
users to use == and != operators. Aside from the definition changes,
this was done by the following semantic patch:
@@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@
- !IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1)
+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) != E1
@@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@
- IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1)
+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == E1
@@ expression dev_priv, from, until; @@
- IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, from, until)
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
[Jani: Minor conflict resolve while applying.]
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210413051002.92589-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
This reverts commit 71c1a49983.
The proper fix is Wa_14013723622, so now we can revert this WA and
get back some power savings.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210408204917.254272-2-jose.souza@intel.com
PSR2 is defeatured for RKL and ADL-S, no important power impact as
those are desktop CPUs and PSR2 was not even enabled by default yet
in platforms without PSR2 HW tracking.
HSDES: 14011750631
HSDES: 14011741325
BSpec: 53273
Cc: Caz Yokoyama <Caz.Yokoyama@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210408214205.327704-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Use Coccinelle to convert most of the usage of INTEL_GEN() and IS_GEN()
in the display code to use DISPLAY_VER() comparisons instead. The
following semantic patch was used:
@@ expression dev_priv, E; @@
- INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) == E
+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E)
@@ expression dev_priv; @@
- INTEL_GEN(dev_priv)
+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv)
@@ expression dev_priv; expression E; @@
- IS_GEN(dev_priv, E)
+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E)
@@
expression dev_priv;
expression from, until;
@@
- IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
+ IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
There are still some display-related uses of INTEL_GEN() in intel_pm.c
(watermark code) and i915_irq.c. Those will be updated separately.
v2:
- Use new IS_DISPLAY_RANGE and IS_DISPLAY_VER helpers. (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210320044245.3920043-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Even though GEN12+ HW supports PSR + DC3CO, DMC's HW DC3CO exit mechanism
has an issue with using of Selective Fecth and PSR2 manual tracking.
And as some GEN12+ platforms (RKL, ADL-S) don't support PSR2 HW tracking,
Selective Fetch will be enabled by default on that platforms.
Therefore if the system enables PSR Selective Fetch / PSR manual tracking,
it does not allow DC3CO dc state, in that case.
When this DC3CO exit issue is addressed while PSR Selective Fetch is
enabled, this restriction should be removed.
v2: Address Jose's review comment.
- Fix typo
- Move check routine of DC3CO ability to
tgl_dc3co_exitline_compute_config()
v3: Change the check routine of enablement of psr2 sel fetch. (Jose)
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210222213006.1609085-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
This will set the right value of source_support when the port
encoder/port supports PSR but sink don't.
This change will also be needed in future for panel replay as psr
struct needs to be initialized even if disconnected or current sink
don't support PSR.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209181439.215104-4-jose.souza@intel.com
If source_support is set the platform supports PSR so no need to check
it again at every CAN_PSR().
Also removing the intel_dp_is_edp() calls, if sink_support is set
the sink connected is for sure a eDP panel.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209181439.215104-3-jose.souza@intel.com
There is no support for two pipes one transcoder for PSR and if we had
that the current code should not use cpu_transcoder.
Also I can't see a scenario where crtc_state->enable_psr2_sel_fetch is
set and PSR is not enabled and if by a bug it happens PSR HW will just
ignore any value in set in PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL.
So dropping all the rest and keeping the same behavior that we have
with intel_psr2_program_plane_sel_fetch().
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209181439.215104-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Right now CI is blacklisting module reload, so we need to be able to
enable PSR2 selective fetch in run time to test this feature before
enable it by default.
Changes in IGT will also be needed.
v2:
- Fixed handling of I915_PSR_DEBUG_ENABLE_SEL_FETCH in
intel_psr_debug_set()
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209205036.351076-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Rework the plane init calls to do the gen test one level higher.
Rework some of the plane helpers so they can live in new file,
there is still some scope to clean up the plane/fb interactions
later.
v2: drop atomic code back, rename file to Ville suggestions,
add header file.
v3: move scaler bits back
v4: drop wrong new includes (Ville)
v5: integrate the ccs gen12 changes
v6: fix unrelated code movement (Ville)
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
[Jani: fixed up sparse warnings.]
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/4e88a5c6b9ab3b93cc2b6c7d78c26ae86f6abbd0.1612536383.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
While JSL and EHL eDP transcoder supports PSR2, the phy of this
platforms only supports eDP 1.3, so removing PSR2 support as this
feature was added in eDP 1.4.
Signed-off-by: Edmund Dea <edmund.j.dea@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204175830.97857-1-jose.souza@intel.com
It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and
DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder
supportable PSR.
And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to
intel_dp's intel_psr structure.
It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting
multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of
enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with
a single transcoder PSR case yet.
v2: Fix indentation and add comments
v3: Remove Blank line
v4: Rebased
v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment.
- Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector()
v6: Address Anshuman's review comments
- Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of
a single pipe PSR
v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder
PSR on BDW+
v8: Address Anshuman's review comments
- Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn()
v9: Fix commit message
v10: Rebased
v11: Address Jose's review comment.
- Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl().
- In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private.
- Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR.
v12: Address Jose's review comment.
- Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into
commit_pipe_config().
- Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original
on i915_psr_sink_status_show().
- Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function.
- In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on
intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder.
- Add an whitespace to comments.
v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment.
- Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro.
- In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe,
fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush().
- Remove redundant or unneeded codes.
- Update comments.
v14: Address Jose's review comment
- Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and
for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro.
- Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure.
- Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support.
- Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from
psr_compute_config().
- Remove redundant or unneeded codes.
v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from
intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl()
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
Even though our HW supports PSR + VRR, the available panels
do not work reliably with PSR and VRR together. So if user
requested VRR and is supported by HW enable that and do not
enable PSR in that case.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210122232647.22688-7-manasi.d.navare@intel.com
Split out the DP aux functionality to a new intel_dp_aux.[ch]. This is a
surprisingly clean cut.
v2:
- Remove intel_dp_pack_aux declaration from intel_dp.h (Anshuman)
- Fixed some whitespace/comment checkpatch warnings
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210120101834.19813-4-jani.nikula@intel.com
TGL adds another level of indirection for applying WA based on stepping
information rather than PCI REVID. So change TGL_REVID enum into
stepping enum and use PCI REVID as index into revid to stepping table to
fetch correct display and GT stepping for application of WAs as
suggested by Matt Roper.
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Aditya Swarup <aditya.swarup@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210119192931.1116500-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
This reverts commit 0883ce8146. Originally
these quirks were added because of the issues with using the eDP
backlight interfaces on certain laptop panels, which made it impossible
to properly probe for DPCD backlight support without having a whitelist
for panels that we know have working VESA backlight control interfaces
over DPCD. As well, it should be noted it was impossible to use the
normal sink OUI for recognizing these panels as none of them actually
filled out their OUIs, hence needing to resort to checking EDIDs.
At the time we weren't really sure why certain panels had issues with
DPCD backlight controls, but we eventually figured out that there was a
second interface that these problematic laptop panels actually did work
with and advertise properly: Intel's proprietary backlight interface for
HDR panels. So far the testing we've done hasn't brought any panels to
light that advertise this interface and don't support it properly, which
means we finally have a real solution to this problem.
As a result, we now have no need for the force DPCD backlight quirk, and
furthermore this also removes the need for any kind of EDID quirk
checking in DRM. So, let's just revert it for now since we were the only
driver using this.
v3:
* Rebase
v2:
* Fix indenting error picked up by checkpatch in
intel_edp_init_connector()
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: thaytan@noraisin.net
Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114221709.2261452-6-lyude@redhat.com
It programs Plane's calculated x, y, offset to Plane SF register.
It does the calculation of x and y offsets using
skl_calc_main_surface_offset().
v3: Update commit message
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-4-jose.souza@intel.com
Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area.
Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software
needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips.
Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another
loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe
damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending
of all planes can happen.
v2:
- do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format
v4:
- setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area
- mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha
changed
v5:
- taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates
- adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are
invisible in the new state
v6:
- consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it
moved to calculate damaged area
- remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip
v7:
- intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area
v8:
- adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping
- adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the
framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from
v9:
- Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible
- Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and
new state
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Add the calculations to set plane selective fetch registers depending
in the value of the area damaged.
It is still using the whole plane area as damaged but that will change
in next patches.
v2:
- fixed new_plane_state->uapi.dst.y2 typo in
intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update()
- do not shifthing new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format
BSpec: 55229
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201130125750.17820-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Replace the previous approach to force compute the initial PSR state
after i915 take over from firmware by the better and recently added
initial_fastset_check() hook.
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201102221048.104294-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Writes to CURSURFLIVE in TGL are causing IOMMU errors and visual
glitches that are often reproduced when executing CPU intensive
workloads while a eDP 4K panel is attached.
Manually exiting PSR causes the frontbuffer to be updated without
glitches and the IOMMU errors are also gone but this comes at the cost
of less time with PSR active.
So using this workaround until this issue is root caused and a better
fix is found.
The current code is already ready to enable PSR after this exit if
there is not other frontbuffer modifications.
Adding a new if block in psr_force_hw_tracking_exit() instead of reuse
the else/gen8- block because the plan is to revert this workaround
as soon as a better solution is found.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201002231627.24528-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Another step towards PSR2 selective fetch, here programming plane
selective fetch registers and MAN_TRK_CTL enabling selective fetch but
for now it is fetching the whole area of the planes.
The damaged area calculation will come as next and final step.
v2:
- removed warn on when no plane is visible in state
- removed calculations using plane damaged area in
intel_psr2_program_plane_sel_fetch()
v3:
- do not shift 16 positions the plane dst coordinates, only src is
shifted
v4:
- only setting PLANE_SEL_FETCH_CTL_ENABLE and MCURSOR_MODE in
PLANE_SEL_FETCH_CTL
v5:
- not masking bits for cursor
BSpec: 55229
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007195238.53955-3-jose.souza@intel.com
Due to the debugfs flag, has_psr2 in CRTC state could have a different
value than psr.psr2_enabled and it was causing PSR2 subfeatures(DC3CO
and selective fetch) to be set to not a expected state.
So here only taking in consideration the parameter and debugfs flag
when computing PSR state, this way the CRTC state will also have
the correct state.
intel_psr_fastset_force() was already broken as
intel_psr_compute_config() was already only enabling PSR when
psr_global_enabled() and all other PSR requirements are met.
So some changes was required in this function, now it iterates over
all connectors, if it is a eDP connector and is active force a modeset
in the CRTC driving this connector, what will cause the new PSR state
to be set based on the debugfs flag.
v2:
- end connector iterator in error cases
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007195238.53955-2-jose.souza@intel.com
For platforms without selective fetch this register is reserved so
do not write 0 to it.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007195238.53955-1-jose.souza@intel.com
TGL made stepping a litte mess, workarounds refer to the stepping of
the IP(GT or Display) not of the GPU stepping so it would already
require the same solution as used in commit 96c5a15f9f
("drm/i915/kbl: Fix revision ID checks").
But to make things even more messy it have a different IP stepping
mapping between SKUs and the same stepping revision of GT do not match
the same HW between TGL U/Y and regular TGL.
So it was required to have 2 different macros to check GT WAs while
for Display we are able to use just one macro that uses the right
revids table.
All TGL workarounds checked and updated accordingly.
v2:
- removed TODO to check if WA 14010919138 applies to regular TGL.
- fixed display stepping in regular TGL (Anusha)
BSpec: 52890
BSpec: 55378
BSpec: 44455
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivtsa@intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Cc: Penne Lee <penne.y.lee@intel.com>
Cc: Guangyao Bai <guangyao.bai@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200827233943.400946-1-jose.souza@intel.com
From the 3 WAs for PSR2 man track/selective fetch this is only one
needed when doing single full frames at every flip.
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200810174144.76761-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
All GEN12 platforms supports PSR2 selective fetch but not all GEN12
platforms supports PSR2 hardware tracking(aka RKL).
This feature consists in software programming registers with the
damaged area of each plane this way hardware will only fetch from
memory those areas and sent the PSR2 selective update blocks to panel,
saving even more power.
But as initial step it is only enabling the full frame fetch at
every flip, the actual selective fetch part will come in a future
patch.
Also this is only handling the page flip side, it is still completely
missing frontbuffer modifications, that is why the
enable_psr2_sel_fetch parameter was added.
v3:
- calling intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update() during the atomic check phase
(Ville)
BSpec: 55229
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200810174144.76761-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
We have a mix of dport, intel_dport, intel_dig_port and dig_port to
reference a intel_digital_port struct. Numbers are around
5 intel_dport
36 dport
479 intel_dig_port
352 dig_port
Since we already removed the intel_ prefix from most of our other
structs, do the same here and prefer dig_port.
v2: rename everything in i915, not just a few display sources and
reword commit message (from Matt Roper)
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200701045054.23357-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Future patches will bring PSR2 selective fetch configuration
validation but most of the configuration checks will be used for HW
tracking and selective fetch so the reoder was necessary.
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200626010151.221388-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Start using device specific parameters instead of module parameters for
most things. The module parameters become the immutable initial values
for i915 parameters. The device specific parameters in i915->params
start life as a copy of i915_modparams. Any later changes are only
reflected in the debugfs.
The stragglers are:
* i915.force_probe and i915.modeset. Needed before dev_priv is
available. This is fine because the parameters are read-only and never
modified.
* i915.verbose_state_checks. Passing dev_priv to I915_STATE_WARN and
I915_STATE_WARN_ON would result in massive and ugly churn. This is
handled by not exposing the parameter via debugfs, and leaving the
parameter writable in sysfs. This may be fixed up in follow-up work.
* i915.inject_probe_failure. Only makes sense in terms of the module,
not the device. This is handled by not exposing the parameter via
debugfs.
v2: Fix uc i915 lookup code (Michał Winiarski)
Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkilä <juha-pekka.heikkila@intel.com>
Cc: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200618150402.14022-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
The IO buffer Wake and Fast Wake bit size and value have been changed from
Gen12+. It programs the default value of IO buffer Wake and Fast Wake on
Gen12+. It adds definitions of IO buffer Wake and Fast Wake for pre Gen12
and Gen12+. And it aligns PSR2 definition macros.
v2: Fix macro definitions. (José)
v3: Addressed review comments from José
- Add missing default values of IO_BUFFER_WAKE and FAST_WAKE for GEN9+
- Change a style of macro naming in order to use lines as input.
- Update Todo comments.
v4: Add parentheses to macros to avoid precedence issues.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200607143614.185246-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
This parameter is meant to be used when PSR issues are found as some
issues in the past was due wrong values set in VBT so this would be
a quick and easy way to ask users or for us to check if the issue is
due VBT values.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200520212756.354623-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Jouni Högander
Animesh Manna
Ville Syrjälä
Imre Deak
Mika Kahola
Jani Nikula
Matt Roper
Dnyaneshwar Bhadane
Luca Coelho
Andrzej Hajda
José Roberto de Souza
Tom Rix
Gwan-gyeong Mun
Anusha Srivatsa
Rodrigo Vivi
Lucas De Marchi
Dave Airlie
Edmund Dea
Manasi Navare
Aditya Swarup
Lyude Paul