40 lines
1.4 KiB
HTML
40 lines
1.4 KiB
HTML
From: Jms at B5
|
|
<HTML>
|
|
<HEAD>
|
|
<TITLE>Post to rastb5 (re:Who Wo (95-12-05 03:36:02)</TITLE>
|
|
</HEAD>
|
|
<BODY>
|
|
[America Online postings by JMS]
|
|
<A HREF="/cgi-bin/lurkfind">Search</A>
|
|
- <A HREF="32.html">Previous</A> - <A HREF="34.html">Next</A>
|
|
<BR>
|
|
<H2>Post to rastb5 (re:Who Wo</H2>
|
|
95-12-05 03:36:02
|
|
<PRE>{about the bogus "JMS is being paid to be on AOL" message}
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I suppose it can be reposted. May stop some of this. I hear
|
|
people are saying, "Hey, it's okay if he makes money being on AOL," defending
|
|
it, when it isn't true to *begin* with. If I were doing so, if AOL thought a
|
|
B5 presence were important enough to pay for it, heck, I'd be taking out ads
|
|
in the Times. But as far as AOL is concerned, I'm just one more subscriber,
|
|
and I pay my way same as everybody else.
|
|
|
|
I just hope somebody's called the little twit on the fact that he went
|
|
around calling others liars, then went out and posted his message about my
|
|
alleged "contract with AOL" as though it were an absolute fact, even referred
|
|
to a clause *within* that contract...and clearly, obviously, flatly lied
|
|
about the existence of a document that isn't there. It's a *deliberate*
|
|
lie...it isn't a speculation, wasn't phrased in the form of a question, he
|
|
deliberately went out and posted an out and out *verifiable lie* to the
|
|
entire usenet, knowing it was a lie.
|
|
|
|
Never ceases to amaze me....
|
|
|
|
|
|
jms
|
|
|
|
|
|
</PRE>
|
|
</BODY>
|
|
</HTML>
|