mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
c5884ef477
Some of us gotten used to producing large quantities of peer feedback at work, every 3 or 6 months. Extending the same courtesy to community members seems like a logical step. It may be hard for some folks to get validation of how important their work is internally, especially at smaller companies which don't employ many kernel experts. The concept of "peer feedback" may be a hyperscaler / silicon valley thing so YMMV. Hopefully we can build more context as we go. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| 1.Intro.rst | ||
| 2.Process.rst | ||
| 3.Early-stage.rst | ||
| 4.Coding.rst | ||
| 5.Posting.rst | ||
| 6.Followthrough.rst | ||
| 7.AdvancedTopics.rst | ||
| 8.Conclusion.rst | ||
| adding-syscalls.rst | ||
| applying-patches.rst | ||
| botching-up-ioctls.rst | ||
| changes.rst | ||
| clang-format.rst | ||
| code-of-conduct-interpretation.rst | ||
| code-of-conduct.rst | ||
| coding-style.rst | ||
| deprecated.rst | ||
| development-process.rst | ||
| email-clients.rst | ||
| embargoed-hardware-issues.rst | ||
| handling-regressions.rst | ||
| howto.rst | ||
| index.rst | ||
| kernel-docs.rst | ||
| kernel-driver-statement.rst | ||
| kernel-enforcement-statement.rst | ||
| license-rules.rst | ||
| magic-number.rst | ||
| maintainer-handbooks.rst | ||
| maintainer-netdev.rst | ||
| maintainer-pgp-guide.rst | ||
| maintainer-tip.rst | ||
| maintainers.rst | ||
| management-style.rst | ||
| programming-language.rst | ||
| researcher-guidelines.rst | ||
| stable-api-nonsense.rst | ||
| stable-kernel-rules.rst | ||
| submit-checklist.rst | ||
| submitting-patches.rst | ||
| volatile-considered-harmful.rst | ||