mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
292f86f005
If mmiowb() is always used prior to releasing spinlock as Doc suggests, then it's safe against preemption; but I'm not convinced that's always the case. If preemption occurs between sync and get_paca()->io_sync = 0, I believe there's no problem. But in the unlikely event that gcc does the store relative to another register than r13 (as it did with current), then there's a small danger of setting another cpu's io_sync to 0, after it had just set it to 1. Rewrite ppc64 mmiowb to prevent that. The remaining io_sync assignments in io.h all get_paca()->io_sync = 1, which is harmless even if preempted to the wrong cpu (the context switch itself syncs); and those in spinlock.h are while preemption is disabled. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| acpi | ||
| asm-alpha | ||
| asm-arm | ||
| asm-arm26 | ||
| asm-avr32 | ||
| asm-cris | ||
| asm-frv | ||
| asm-generic | ||
| asm-h8300 | ||
| asm-i386 | ||
| asm-ia64 | ||
| asm-m32r | ||
| asm-m68k | ||
| asm-m68knommu | ||
| asm-mips | ||
| asm-parisc | ||
| asm-powerpc | ||
| asm-ppc | ||
| asm-s390 | ||
| asm-sh | ||
| asm-sh64 | ||
| asm-sparc | ||
| asm-sparc64 | ||
| asm-um | ||
| asm-v850 | ||
| asm-x86_64 | ||
| asm-xtensa | ||
| crypto | ||
| keys | ||
| linux | ||
| math-emu | ||
| media | ||
| mtd | ||
| net | ||
| pcmcia | ||
| rdma | ||
| rxrpc | ||
| scsi | ||
| sound | ||
| video | ||
| Kbuild | ||