When running BPF selftests on arm64 with a 64K page size, I encountered
the following two test failures:
sockmap_basic/sockmap skb_verdict change tail:FAIL
tc_change_tail:FAIL
With further debugging, I identified the root cause in the following
kernel code within __bpf_skb_change_tail():
u32 max_len = BPF_SKB_MAX_LEN;
u32 min_len = __bpf_skb_min_len(skb);
int ret;
if (unlikely(flags || new_len > max_len || new_len < min_len))
return -EINVAL;
With a 4K page size, new_len = 65535 and max_len = 16064, the function
returns -EINVAL. However, With a 64K page size, max_len increases to
261824, allowing execution to proceed further in the function. This is
because BPF_SKB_MAX_LEN scales with the page size and larger page sizes
result in higher max_len values.
Updating the new_len parameter in both tests based on actual kernel
page size resolved both failures.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250612035037.2207911-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
As requested by Daniel, we need to add a selftest to cover
bpf_skb_change_tail() cases in skb_verdict. Here we test trimming,
growing and error cases, and validate its expected return values and the
expected sizes of the payload.
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241213034057.246437-3-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com
Yonghong Song
Cong Wang