With recent uprobe fix [1] the sync time after unregistering uprobe is
much longer and prolongs the consumer test which creates and destroys
hundreds of uprobes.
This change adds 16 threads (which fits the test logic) and speeds up
the test.
Before the change:
# perf stat --null ./test_progs -t uprobe_multi_test/consumers
#421/9 uprobe_multi_test/consumers:OK
#421 uprobe_multi_test:OK
Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Performance counter stats for './test_progs -t uprobe_multi_test/consumers':
28.818778973 seconds time elapsed
0.745518000 seconds user
0.919186000 seconds sys
After the change:
# perf stat --null ./test_progs -t uprobe_multi_test/consumers 2>&1
#421/9 uprobe_multi_test/consumers:OK
#421 uprobe_multi_test:OK
Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Performance counter stats for './test_progs -t uprobe_multi_test/consumers':
3.504790814 seconds time elapsed
0.012141000 seconds user
0.751760000 seconds sys
[1] commit 87195a1ee3 ("uprobes: switch to RCU Tasks Trace flavor for better performance")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241108134544.480660-14-jolsa@kernel.org
Adding uprobe session consumers to the consumer test,
so we get the session into the test mix.
In addition scaling down the test to have just 1 uprobe
and 1 uretprobe, otherwise the test time grows and is
unsuitable for CI even with threads.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241108134544.480660-13-jolsa@kernel.org
Testing that the session ret_handler bypass works on single
uprobe with multiple consumers, each with different session
ignore return value.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241108134544.480660-12-jolsa@kernel.org
Making sure uprobe.session program can return only [0,1] values.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241108134544.480660-10-jolsa@kernel.org
Adding uprobe session test that verifies the cookie value is stored
properly when single uprobe-ed function is executed recursively.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241108134544.480660-9-jolsa@kernel.org
Adding uprobe session test that verifies the cookie value
get properly propagated from entry to return program.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241108134544.480660-8-jolsa@kernel.org
Adding uprobe session test and testing that the entry program
return value controls execution of the return probe program.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241108134544.480660-7-jolsa@kernel.org
The new uprobe changes bring some new behaviour that we need to reflect
in the consumer test. Now pending uprobe instance in the kernel can
survive longer and thus might call uretprobe consumer callbacks in
some situations in which, previously, such callback would be omitted.
We now need to take that into account in uprobe-multi consumer tests.
The idea being that uretprobe under test either stayed from before to
after (uret_stays + test_bit) or uretprobe instance survived and we
have uretprobe active in after (uret_survives + test_bit).
uret_survives just states that uretprobe survives if there are *any*
uretprobes both before and after (overlapping or not, doesn't matter)
and uprobe was attached before.
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241107094337.3848210-1-jolsa@kernel.org
Availability of the gettid definition across glibc versions supported by
BPF selftests is not certain. Currently, all users in the tree open-code
syscall to gettid. Convert them to a common macro definition.
Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241104171959.2938862-3-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Let's bail out from consumer test after we hit first fail,
so we don't pollute the log with many instances with possibly
the same error.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
With newly merged code the uprobe behaviour is slightly different
and affects uprobe consumer test.
We no longer need to check if the uprobe object is still preserved
after removing last uretprobe, because it stays as long as there's
pending/installed uretprobe instance.
This allows to run uretprobe consumers registered 'after' uprobe was
hit even if previous uretprobe got unregistered before being hit.
The uprobe object will be now removed after the last uprobe ref is
released and in such case it's held by ri->uprobe (return instance)
which is released after the uretprobe is hit.
Reported-by: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@pm.me>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@pm.me>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/w6U8Z9fdhjnkSp2UaFaV1fGqJXvfLEtDKEUyGDkwmoruDJ_AgF_c0FFhrkeKW18OqiP-05s9yDKiT6X-Ns-avN_ABf0dcUkXqbSJN1TQSXo=@pm.me/
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The idea is to run same test as for test_pid_filter_process, but instead
of standard fork-ed process we create the process with clone(CLONE_VM..)
to make sure the thread leader process filter works properly in this case.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240905115124.1503998-5-jolsa@kernel.org
The idea is to create and monitor 3 uprobes, each trigered in separate
process and make sure the bpf program gets executed just for the proper
PID specified via pid filter.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240905115124.1503998-4-jolsa@kernel.org
Adding test that attaches/detaches multiple consumers on
single uprobe and verifies all were hit as expected.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240722202758.3889061-3-jolsa@kernel.org
Validate libbpf's USDT-over-multi-uprobe logic by adding USDTs to
existing multi-uprobe tests. This checks correct libbpf fallback to
singular uprobes (when run on older kernels with buggy PID filtering).
We reuse already established child process and child thread testing
infrastructure, so additions are minimal. These test fail on either
older kernels or older version of libbpf that doesn't detect PID
filtering problems.
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240521163401.3005045-6-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Extend existing multi-uprobe tests to test that PID filtering works
correctly. We already have child *process* tests, but we need also child
*thread* tests. This patch adds spawn_thread() helper to start child
thread, wait for it to be ready, and then instruct it to trigger desired
uprobes.
Additionally, we extend BPF-side code to track thread ID, not just
process ID. Also we detect whether extraneous triggerings with
unexpected process IDs happened, and validate that none of that happened
in practice.
These changes prove that fixed PID filtering logic for multi-uprobe
works as expected. These tests fail on old kernels.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240521163401.3005045-5-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Current implementation of PID filtering logic for multi-uprobes in
uprobe_prog_run() is filtering down to exact *thread*, while the intent
for PID filtering it to filter by *process* instead. The check in
uprobe_prog_run() also differs from the analogous one in
uprobe_multi_link_filter() for some reason. The latter is correct,
checking task->mm, not the task itself.
Fix the check in uprobe_prog_run() to perform the same task->mm check.
While doing this, we also update get_pid_task() use to use PIDTYPE_TGID
type of lookup, given the intent is to get a representative task of an
entire process. This doesn't change behavior, but seems more logical. It
would hold task group leader task now, not any random thread task.
Last but not least, given multi-uprobe support is half-broken due to
this PID filtering logic (depending on whether PID filtering is
important or not), we need to make it easy for user space consumers
(including libbpf) to easily detect whether PID filtering logic was
already fixed.
We do it here by adding an early check on passed pid parameter. If it's
negative (and so has no chance of being a valid PID), we return -EINVAL.
Previous behavior would eventually return -ESRCH ("No process found"),
given there can't be any process with negative PID. This subtle change
won't make any practical change in behavior, but will allow applications
to detect PID filtering fixes easily. Libbpf fixes take advantage of
this in the next patch.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Fixes: b733eeade4 ("bpf: Add pid filter support for uprobe_multi link")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240521163401.3005045-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
We fail to create uprobe if we pass negative offset. Add more tests
validating kernel-side error checking code.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231217215538.3361991-3-jolsa@kernel.org
If an abnormally huge cnt is used for multi-uprobes attachment, the
following warning will be reported:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 406 at mm/util.c:632 kvmalloc_node+0xd9/0xe0
Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(O)
CPU: 7 PID: 406 Comm: test_progs Tainted: G ...... 6.7.0-rc3+ #32
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) ......
RIP: 0010:kvmalloc_node+0xd9/0xe0
......
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? __warn+0x89/0x150
? kvmalloc_node+0xd9/0xe0
bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach+0x14a/0x480
__sys_bpf+0x14a9/0x2bc0
do_syscall_64+0x36/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
......
</TASK>
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
So add a test to ensure the warning is fixed.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231215100708.2265609-4-houtao@huaweicloud.com
We need to get offsets for static variables in following changes,
so making elf_resolve_syms_offsets to take st_type value as argument
and passing it to elf_sym_iter_new.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231125193130.834322-2-jolsa@kernel.org
Attaching extra program to same functions system wide for api
and link tests.
This way we can test the pid filter works properly when there's
extra system wide consumer on the same uprobe that will trigger
the original uprobe handler.
We expect to have the same counts as before.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230809083440.3209381-29-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Running api and link tests also with pid filter and checking
the probe gets executed only for specific pid.
Spawning extra process to trigger attached uprobes and checking
we get correct counts from executed programs.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230809083440.3209381-28-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Adding test that attaches 50k usdt probes in usdt_multi binary.
After the attach is done we run the binary and make sure we get
proper amount of hits.
With current uprobes:
# perf stat --null ./test_progs -n 254/6
#254/6 uprobe_multi_test/bench_usdt:OK
#254 uprobe_multi_test:OK
Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Performance counter stats for './test_progs -n 254/6':
1353.659680562 seconds time elapsed
With uprobe_multi link:
# perf stat --null ./test_progs -n 254/6
#254/6 uprobe_multi_test/bench_usdt:OK
#254 uprobe_multi_test:OK
Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
Performance counter stats for './test_progs -n 254/6':
0.322046364 seconds time elapsed
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230809083440.3209381-26-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Adding test that attaches 50k uprobes in uprobe_multi binary.
After the attach is done we run the binary and make sure we
get proper amount of hits.
The resulting attach/detach times on my setup:
test_bench_attach_uprobe:PASS:uprobe_multi__open 0 nsec
test_bench_attach_uprobe:PASS:uprobe_multi__attach 0 nsec
test_bench_attach_uprobe:PASS:uprobes_count 0 nsec
test_bench_attach_uprobe: attached in 0.346s
test_bench_attach_uprobe: detached in 0.419s
#262/5 uprobe_multi_test/bench_uprobe:OK
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230809083440.3209381-24-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Adding uprobe_multi test for bpf_link_create attach function.
Testing attachment using the struct bpf_link_create_opts.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230809083440.3209381-22-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Adding uprobe_multi test for bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi
attach function.
Testing attachment using glob patterns and via bpf_uprobe_multi_opts
paths/syms fields.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230809083440.3209381-21-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Adding uprobe_multi test for skeleton load/attach functions,
to test skeleton auto attach for uprobe_multi link.
Test that bpf_get_func_ip works properly for uprobe_multi
attachment.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230809083440.3209381-20-jolsa@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Jiri Olsa
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Lin Yikai
Andrii Nakryiko
Hou Tao