Do not enable psr2 if panel ganularity is not aligned with DSC slice
height when DSC is enabled
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221102174544.2288205-2-jouni.hogander@intel.com
MTL shares PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL bits with ADL. Currently some bit
getter functions are incorrect for MTL. This patch fixes those.
Bspec: 49274
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Fixes: 47d4ae2192 ("drm/i915/mtl: Extend PSR support")
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221101115342.1136720-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Currently we are observing mouse cursor stuttering when using
xrandr --scaling=1.2x1.2. X scaling/transformation seems to be
doing fronbuffer rendering. When moving mouse cursor X seems to
perform several invalidates and only one DirtyFB. I.e. it seems
to be assuming updates are sent to panel while drawing is done.
Earlier we were disabling PSR in frontbuffer invalidate call back
(when drawing in X started). PSR was re-enabled in frontbuffer
flush callback (dirtyfb ioctl). This was working fine with X
scaling/transformation. Now we are just enabling continuous full
frame (cff) in PSR invalidate callback. Enabling cff doesn't
trigger any updates. It just configures PSR to send full frame
when updates are sent. I.e. there are no updates on screen before
PSR flush callback is made. X seems to be doing several updates
in frontbuffer before doing dirtyfb ioctl.
Fix this by sending single update on every invalidate callback.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Fixes: 805f04d42a ("drm/i915/display/psr: Use continuos full frame to handle frontbuffer invalidations")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6679
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reported-by: Brian J. Tarricone <brian@tarricone.org>
Tested-by: Brian J. Tarricone <brian@tarricone.org>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221024054649.31299-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Meteorlake and display 14 platform don't have any PSR differences
when comparing to Alderlake-P display, so it was only necessary to
extend some checks to properly program hardware.
BSpec: 55229, 49196
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220907081543.92268-1-mika.kahola@intel.com
Current PSR code is supposed to use TRANSCODER_EDP to force 0 shift for
bits in PSR_IMR/IIR registers:
/*
* gen12+ has registers relative to transcoder and one per transcoder
* using the same bit definition: handle it as TRANSCODER_EDP to force
* 0 shift in bit definition
*/
At the time of writing the code assumption "TRANSCODER_EDP == 0" was made.
This is not the case and all fields in PSR_IMR and PSR_IIR are shifted
incorrectly if DISPLAY_VER >= 12.
Fix this by adding separate register field defines for >=12 and add bit
getter functions to keep code readability.
v4:
- Remove EDP from TGL definitions (José)
- Use REG_BIT and REG_GENMASK (José)
v3:
- Add separate register field defines (José)
- Add bit getter functions (José)
v2:
- Improve commit message (José)
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Fixes: 8241cfbe67 ("drm/i915/tgl: Access the right register when handling PSR interruptions")
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221003072011.72408-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Use existing drm_atomic_helper_damage_merged from generic drm code
instead of implementing own loop to iterate over damage_clips.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220823112920.352563-4-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
drm_plane_state->src is modified when offset is calculated:
before calculation:
src.x1 = 8192, src.y1 = 8192
after calculation (pitch = 65536, cpp = 4, alignment = 262144)
src.x1 = 8192, src.y1 = 0, offset = 0x20000000
Damage clips are relative to original coodrdinates provided by
user-space. To compare these against src coordinates we need to use
original coordinates as provided by user-space. These can be obtained
by using drm_plane_state_src.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220823112920.352563-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Selective update doesn't work if SU start address is 0 and start/end
SDP is configured to be sent prior to SU start/end lines. PSR2 has to be
disabled in this case for Alder Lake.
HSDES: 22012279113
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220905102355.176622-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Equation for sending start/end SDP prior to the SU region start/end
has changed. Update used formula.
Bspec: 49274
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220905102355.176622-2-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
The issue here was on for_each_intel_encoder_mask_with_psr() over the
new_crtc_state encoder mask, so if the CRTC was being disabled mask
would be zero and it would not have any chance to disable PSR.
So here doing for_each_intel_encoder_mask_with_psr() over the
old_crtc_state encoder mask and then using the new_crtc_state to
check if PSR needs to be disabled.
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220714150755.154985-2-jose.souza@intel.com
This patches fixes a issue but not in the right way as
for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state() will interate over all CRTCs
not only the crtc passed as parameter, also this two for_each loops
are not necessary and only make code harder to understand.
Proper fix will be discussed in the next patch.
This reverts commit 75f664903d.
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220714150755.154985-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Currently PSR is left enabled when all planes are disabled if there
is no attached encoder in new state. This seems to be causing FIFO
underruns.
Fix this by checking if encoder exists in new crtc state and disable
PSR if it doesn't.
v2: Unify disable logic with existing
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reported-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220711111750.881552-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Commit 3cf0507625 ("drm/i915/bios: Split VBT data into per-panel vs.
global parts") cause PSR to be disabled when enable_psr has the
default value and there is at least one DP port that do not supports
PSR.
That was happening because intel_psr_init() is called for every DP
port and then enable_psr is globaly set to 0 based on the PSR support
of the DP port.
Here dropping the enable_psr overwritten and using the VBT PSR value
when enable_psr is set as default.
Fixes: 3cf0507625 ("drm/i915/bios: Split VBT data into per-panel vs. global parts")
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220608203344.513082-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Move the panel specific VBT parsing to happen during the
output probing stage. Needs to be done because the VBT
parsing will need to look at the EDID to determine
the correct panel_type on some machines.
We split the parsed VBT data (i915->vbt) along the same
boundary. For the moment we just hoist all the panel
specific stuff into connector->panel.vbt since that seems
like the most convenient place for eg. the backlight code.
Note that we simply drop the drrs type check from
intel_drrs_frontbuffer_update() since that operates on the whole
device rather than a specific connector/encoder. But the check
was just a micro optimization so removing it doesn't actually
mattter for correctness.
TODO: Lot's of cleanup to be done in the future. Eg. most of
the DSI stuff could probably be eliminated entirely and just
parsed on demand during DSI init.
v2: Note the intel_drrs_frontbuffer_update() change
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220510104242.6099-13-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Current update area calculation is not handling situation where
e.g. cursor plane is fully or partially outside pipe area.
Fix this by checking damage area against pipe_src area using
drm_rect_intersect.
v2: Set x1 and x2 in damaged_area initialization
v3: Move drm_rect_intersect into clip_area_update
v4: draw_area -> pipe_src
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5440
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220513142811.779331-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Currently we have some corner cases where area calculation fails. For
these sel fetch area calculation ends up having update area as y1 = 0,
y2 = 4. Instead of these values safer option is full update.
One of such for example is big fb with offset. We don't have usable
offset in psr2_sel_fetch_update. Currently it's open what is the
proper way to fix this corner case. Use full update for now.
v2: Commit message modified
v3: Print out debug info once when area calculation fails
v4: Use drm_info_once
v5: pipeA -> "pipe %c", pipe_name(crtc-pipe)
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220513142811.779331-2-jouni.hogander@intel.com
After commit 805f04d42a ("drm/i915/display/psr: Use continuos full
frame to handle frontbuffer invalidations") was merged we started to
get some drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, !(tmp & PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_ENABLE))
in tests that are executed in pipe B.
This is probably due psr2_sel_fetch_cff_enabled being left set during
PSR disable in the pipe A, so the PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL write in
intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() is skipped in pipe B and then
we get the warning when actually enabling PSR after planes programing.
We don't get such warnings when running tests in pipe A because
PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL is only cleared when enabling PSR2 with hardware
tracking.
Was not able to reproduce this issue but cleaning the PSR state
disable will not harm anything at all.
Fixes: 805f04d42a ("drm/i915/display/psr: Use continuos full frame to handle frontbuffer invalidations")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5634
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220414151118.21980-2-jose.souza@intel.com
If any of the PSR2 checks after intel_psr2_sel_fetch_config_valid()
fails, enable_psr2_sel_fetch will be kept enabled causing problems
in the functions that only checks for it and not for has_psr2.
So here moving the check that do not depend on enable_psr2_sel_fetch
and for the remaning ones jumping to a section that unset
enable_psr2_sel_fetch in case of failure to support PSR2.
Fixes: 6e43e276b8 ("drm/i915: Initial implementation of PSR2 selective fetch")
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220414151118.21980-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Instead of exit PSR when a frontbuffer invalidation happens, we can
enable the PSR2 selective fetch continuous full frame, that will keep
the panel updated like PSR was disabled but without keeping PSR active.
So as soon as the frontbuffer flush happens we can disable the
continuous full frame and start to do selective fetches much quicker
than the path that would enable PSR, that will wait a few frames
to actually activate PSR.
Also this approach has proven to fix some glitches found in Alderlake-P
when there are a lot of invalidations happening together with page
flips.
Some may ask why it is writing to CURSURFLIVE(), it is because
that is the way that hardware team provided us to poke display to
handle PSR updates, and it is being used since display 9.
v2:
- handling possible race conditions between frontbuffer rendering and
page flips
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Khaled Almahallawy <khaled.almahallawy@intel.com>
Cc: Shawn C Lee <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220405155344.47219-3-jose.souza@intel.com
Frontbuffer rendering and page flips can race with each other
and this can potentialy cause issues with PSR2 selective fetch.
And because pipe/crtc updates are time sentive we can't grab the
PSR lock after intel_pipe_update_start() and before
intel_pipe_update_end().
So here adding the lock and unlock functions and calls, the
proper PSR2 selective fetch handling will come in a separated patch.
v2:
- fixed new functions documentation
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220405155344.47219-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Following up what was done in commit 804f468853 ("drm/i915/psr: Set
"SF Partial Frame Enable" also on full update") and also setting
partial frame enable when psr_force_hw_tracking_exit() is called.
Also as PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL is a double buffered registers do a RMW
is not a good idea so here also setting the man_trk_ctl_enable_bit()
that is required in TGL and only doing a register write.
v2:
- not doing a rmw
v3:
- removing the inline from functions that return PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL
bits
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220405155344.47219-1-jose.souza@intel.com
If a error happens and sink_not_reliable is set, PSR should be disabled
for good but that is not happening.
It would be disabled by the function handling the PSR error but then
on the next fastset it would be enabled again in
_intel_psr_post_plane_update().
It would only be disabled for good in the next modeset where has_psr
will be set false.
v2:
- release psr lock before continue
Fixes: 9ce5884e51 ("drm/i915/display: Only keep PSR enabled if there is active planes")
Reported-by: Khaled Almahallawy <khaled.almahallawy@intel.com>
Reported-by: Charlton Lin <charlton.lin@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311185149.110527-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Some users are suffering with PSR2 issues that are under debug or
issues that were root caused to panel firmware bugs, to make life of
those users easier here adding a option to disable PSR2 with kernel
parameters so they can still benefit from PSR1 power savings.
Using the same enable_psr that is current used to turn the whole
feature on or off and allowing user to select up to what PSR version
it should enable.
Right now users only set this parameter to 0 when they want to disable
PSR1 and PSR2 or don't add it at all leaving it to per-chip behavior
so it should not cause a bad impact on users.
v2:
- changing enable_psr values (Ville and Rodrigo)
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/4951
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220224202523.993560-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Currently we are observing occasional screen flickering when
PSR2 selective fetch is enabled. More specifically glitch seems
to happen on full frame update when cursor moves to coords
x = -1 or y = -1.
According to Bspec SF Single full frame should not be set if
SF Partial Frame Enable is not set. This happened to be true for
ADLP as PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_ENABLE is always set and for ADL_P it's
actually "SF Partial Frame Enable" (Bit 31).
Setting "SF Partial Frame Enable" bit also on full update seems to
fix screen flickering.
Also make code more clear by setting PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_ENABLE
only if not on ADL_P. Bit 31 has different meaning in ADL_P.
Bspec: 49274
v2: Fix Mihai Harpau email address
v3: Modify commit message and remove unnecessary comment
Tested-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Fixes: 7f6002e580 ("drm/i915/display: Enable PSR2 selective fetch by default")
Reported-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Mihai Harpau <mharpau@gmail.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5077
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220225070228.855138-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Grouping inside of the same if all the programing sequences and
workarounds of PSR2.
The order of programing changed in intel_psr_enable_source() but
it will not affect PSR2 as at this point PSR2_ENABLE is still disabled.
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220210185223.95399-1-jose.souza@intel.com
When a plane with a multiplanar format is added to the state by
drm_atomic_add_affected_planes(), only the UV plane is
added, so a intel_atomic_get_new_plane_state() call to get the Y
plane state can return a null pointer.
To fix this, intel_atomic_get_plane_state() should be called and
the return needs to be checked for errors, as it could return a EAGAIN
as other atomic state could be holding the lock for the Y plane.
Other issue with the patch being fixed is that the Y plane is not
being committed to hardware because the corresponded plane bit is not
set in update_planes when UV and Y planes are added to the state by
drm_atomic_add_affected_planes().
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Fixes: 3809991ff5 ("drm/i915/display: Add initial selective fetch support for biplanar formats")
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211108213807.39865-1-jose.souza@intel.com
This reverts commit 1f61f0655b.
Now we are supporting selective fetch for biplanar formats.
We can revert WA patch which forced using full fetch for biplanar
formats.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211021101024.13112-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Biplanar formats are using two planes (Y and UV). This patch adds handling
of Y selective fetch area by utilizing existing linked plane mechanism.
Also UV plane Y offset configuration is modified according to Bspec.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211021101024.13112-2-jouni.hogander@intel.com
PSR2 is supported in transcoder A and B on Alderlake-P.
v2:
- explicity checking for transcoder A and B to avoid invalid transcoder
BSpec: 49185
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com> # v1
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Hogander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com> # v2
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211027180545.55660-1-jose.souza@intel.com
PSR2 apparently requires some planes to be enabled for some
silly reason, and so we are now trying to turn PSR off before
planes go off. Except during a full modeset that is handled
less clearly through reorganization of the modeset sequence.
That is not great as it makes the code mode complex, and
prevents us from doing nice things such as just turning off
all the planes at the very start of the modeset. So let's
move the PSR pre_plane_update() thing to a spot where it
will handle both full modesets and everything else.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211022103304.24164-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Alderlake-P was getting 'max time under evasion' messages when PSR2
is enabled, this is due PIPE_SCANLINE/PIPEDSL returning 0 over a
period of time longer than VBLANK_EVASION_TIME_US.
For PSR1 we had the same issue so intel_psr_wait_for_idle() was
implemented to wait for PSR1 to get into idle state but nothing was
done for PSR2.
For PSR2 we can't only wait for idle state as PSR2 tends to keep
into sleep state(ready to send selective updates).
Waiting for any state below deep sleep proved to be effective in
avoiding the evasion messages and also not wasted a lot of time.
v2:
- dropping the additional wait_for loops, only the _wait_for_atomic()
is necessary
- waiting for states below EDP_PSR2_STATUS_STATE_DEEP_SLEEP
v3:
- dropping intel_wait_for_condition_atomic() function
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211005231851.67698-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Right now the only user of psr_pause/resume is intel_cdclk but
additional users will be added in the future and we may need
do reference counting for PSR pause and resume, for now only adding a
warn_on so this cases do not go unnoticed.
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Jouni Hogander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211020003558.222198-2-jose.souza@intel.com
With all the recent fixes PSR2 is properly working in Alderlake-P but
due to some issues that don't have software workarounds it will not be
supported in display steppings older than B0.
Even with this patch PSR2 will no be enabled by default in ADL-P, it
still requires enable_psr2_sel_fetch to be set to true, what some
of our tests does.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930001409.254817-7-jose.souza@intel.com
The Wa_14014971508 is required to fix scanout when a feature that i915
do not support is enabled and this feature is not planned to be enabled
for adlp.
Keeping this workaround enabled can badly hurt power-savings when
a full frame fetch is required(see psr2_sel_fetch_plane_state_supported()
and psr2_sel_fetch_pipe_state_supported()).
Here a example that could badly hurt power-savings, userspace does
a page flip to a rotated plane, so CONTINUOS_FULL_FRAME set.
But then for a whole 30 seconds nothing in the screen requires updates
but because CONTINUOS_FULL_FRAME is set, it will not go into DC5/DC6.
Reverting Wa_14014971508 fixes that, as only a single frame will be
sent and then display can go to DC5/DC6 for those 30 seconds of
idleness.
BSpec: 54369
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930001409.254817-6-jose.souza@intel.com
Legacy cursor APIs are handled by intel_legacy_cursor_update(), that
calls drm_atomic_helper_update_plane() when going through the
slow/atomic path to update cursor, what was the case for PSR2
selective fetch.
drm_atomic_helper_update_plane() sets
drm_atomic_state->legacy_cursor_update to true when updating the
cursor plane, to allow several cursor updates to happen within the
same frame, as userspace does that.
If drivers waited for a vblank increment at the end of every cursor
movement that would cause a visible lag in the cursor.
But this optimization do not properly work with PSR2 selective fetch
dirt area calculation, for example if within a single frame the cursor
had 3 moves the final dirt area programmed to PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL would
be based in the second movement as old state and third movement as new
state, not updating the area where cursor was in the first state.
So here switching back to the fast path approach in
intel_legacy_cursor_update() and handling cursor movements as
frontbuffer rendering(psr_force_hw_tracking_exit()), that is not the
most optimal for power-savings but is the solution that we have until
mailbox style updates is implemented.
Also removing the cursor workaround as not it is properly undestand
the issue and is know that it will never cover all the cases.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930001409.254817-5-jose.souza@intel.com
When PSR2 selective fetch is enabled writes to CURSURFLIVE alone do
not causes the panel to be updated when doing frontbuffer rendering.
From what I was able to figure from experiments the writes to
CURSURFLIVE takes PSR2 from deep sleep but panel is not updated
because PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL has no start and end region set.
As we don't have the dirt area from current flush and invalidate API
and even if we did userspace could do several draws to frontbuffer and
we would need a way to append all the damaged areas of all the draws
that need to be part of next frame.
So here only programing PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL to do a single full frame
fetch.
It is a safe approach as if scanout is in the visible area
the single full frame will only be visible for hardware in the next
frame because of the double buffering, and if scanout is in vblank
area it will be draw in the current frame.
No need to disable PSR and wait a few miliseconds to enable it again.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930001409.254817-4-jose.souza@intel.com
We are still missing the PSR2 selective fetch handling of multi-planar
formats but until proper handle is added we can workaround it by
doing full frames fetch when state has such formats.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930001409.254817-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
PSR2 selective is not supported over rotated and scaled planes.
We had the rotation check in intel_psr2_sel_fetch_config_valid()
but that code path is only execute when a modeset is needed and
those plane parameters can change without a modeset.
Pipe selective fetch restrictions are also needed, it could be added
in intel_psr_compute_config() but pippe scaling is computed after
it is executed, so leaving as is for now.
There is no much loss in this approach as it would cause selective
fetch to not enabled as for alderlake-P and newer will cause it to
switch to PSR1 that will have the same power-savings as do full pipe
fetch.
Also need to check those restricions in the second
for_each_oldnew_intel_plane_in_state() loop because the state could
only have a plane that is not affected by those restricitons but
the damaged area intersect with planes that has those restrictions,
so a full pipe fetch is required.
v2:
- also handling pipe restrictions
BSpec: 55229
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com> # v1
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210930001409.254817-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Stop using HBR2/3 support as a proxy for TPS3/4 support.
The two are no longer 1:1 in the hardware, arguably they
never were due to HSW ULX which does support TPS3 while
being limited to HBR1.
In more recent times GLK gained support for TPS4 while
being limited to HBR2. And on CNL+ some ports support
HBR3 while others are limited to HBR2, but all ports
support TPS4.
v2: s/INTEL_GEN/DISPLAY_VER/
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210929162404.6717-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
PSR always had a requirement to only be enabled if there is active
planes but not following that never caused any issues.
But that changes in Alderlake-P, leaving PSR enabled without
active planes causes transcoder/port underruns.
Similar behavior was fixed during the pipe disable sequence by
commit 84030adb9e ("drm/i915/display: Disable audio, DRRS and PSR before planes").
intel_dp_compute_psr_vsc_sdp() had to move from
intel_psr_enable_locked() to intel_psr_compute_config() because we
need to be able to disable/enable PSR from atomic states without
connector and encoder state.
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210922215242.66683-3-jose.souza@intel.com
We were not completely following the selective fetch programming
sequence, here some things we were doing wrong:
- not programming plane selective fetch a PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL registers
when doing a modeset
- programming PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL out of vblank
With this changes the last remainig underrun found in Alderlake-P is
fixed.
Bspec: 55229
Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210922215242.66683-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Wa_16014451276 fixes the starting coordinate for PSR2 selective
updates. CHICKEN_TRANS definition of the workaround bit has a wrong
name based on workaround definition and HSD.
Wa_14014971508 allows the screen to continue to be updated when
coming back from DC5/DC6 and SF_SINGLE_FULL_FRAME bit is not kept
set in PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL.
Wa_16012604467 fixes underruns when exiting PSR2 when it is in one
of its internal states.
Wa_14014971508 is still in pending status in BSpec but by
the time this is reviewed and ready to be merged it will be finalized.
v2:
- renamed register to ADLP_1_BASED_X_GRANULARITY
- added comment about all ADL-P supported panels being 1 based X
granularity
BSpec: 54369
BSpec: 50054
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914212507.177511-5-jose.souza@intel.com
drm_atomic_helper_damage_iter_init() + drm_atomic_for_each_plane_damage()
returns the full plane area in case no damaged area was set by
userspace or it was discarted by driver.
This is important to fix the rendering of userspace applications that
does frontbuffer rendering and notify driver about dirty areas but do
not set any dirty clips.
With this we don't need to worry about to check and mark the whole
area as damaged in page flips.
Another important change here is the move of
drm_atomic_add_affected_planes() call, it needs to called late
otherwise the area of all the planes would be added to pipe_clip and
not saving power.
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914212507.177511-4-jose.souza@intel.com
Not sure why but when moving the cursor fast it causes some artifacts
of the cursor to be left in the cursor path, adding some pixels above
the cursor to the damaged area fixes the issue, so leaving this as a
workaround until proper fix is found.
This is reproducile on TGL and ADL-P.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914212507.177511-3-jose.souza@intel.com
BSpec states that the minimum number of frames before selective update
is 2, so making sure this minimum limit is fulfilled.
BSpec: 50422
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210914212507.177511-2-jose.souza@intel.com
At this point is sure that HSW and BDW will never have PSR enabled by
default, so here dropping it from device info and cleaning up code.
v2:
- enable psr support for display 9
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210827174253.51122-1-jose.souza@intel.com
skl_calc_main_surface_offset() is used to calculate an aligned plane
surface address considering the inner framebuffer x and y offset.
It can not be used by selective fetch functions becase there is no
PLANE_SEL_FETCH_SURF.
So the PLANE_SEL_FETCH_OFFSET.y should only be PLANE_OFFSET.y +
damaged_area_within_plane.y1.
This fixes glitches seen in fbcon caused by typing something in
the terminal.
BSpec: 55229
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210815014346.373945-1-jose.souza@intel.com
The PSR enable/disable sequences now require that we program an extra
register in the PHY to adjust the lane disable power setting.
Bspec: 49274
Bspec: 53885
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210723174239.1551352-29-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Without this planes that were added by intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update()
that intersect with pipe damaged area will not
have skl_program_plane() and intel_psr2_program_plane_sel_fetch()
called, causing panel to not be properly updated.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210717011227.204494-2-jose.souza@intel.com
PSR2 is not supported on DG2.
Cc: Caz Yokoyama <Caz.Yokoyama@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210714031540.3539704-49-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Workarounds are documented in the bspec with an exclusive upper bound
(i.e., a "fixed" stepping that no longer needs the workaround). This
makes our driver's use of an inclusive upper bound for stepping ranges
confusing; the differing notation between code and bspec makes it very
easy for mistakes to creep in.
Let's switch the upper bound of our IS_{GT,DISP}_STEP macros over to use
an exclusive upper bound like the bspec does. This also has the benefit
of helping make sure workarounds are properly handled for new minor
steppings that show up (e.g., an A1 between the A0 and B0 we already
knew about) --- if the new intermediate stepping pulls in hardware fixes
early, there will be an update to the workaround definition which lets
us know we need to change our code. If the new stepping does not pull a
hardware fix earlier, then the new stepping will already be captured
properly by the "[begin, fix)" range in the code.
We'll probably need to be extra vigilant in code review of new
workarounds for the near future to make sure developers notice the new
semantics of workaround bounds. But we just migrated a bunch of our
platforms from the IS_REVID bounds over to IS_{GT,DISP}_STEP, so people
are already adjusting to the new macros and now is a good time to make
this change too.
[mattrope: Split out display changes to apply through intel-next tree]
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210717051426.4120328-8-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Implements changes around PSR for alderlake-P:
- EDP_SU_TRACK_ENABLE was removed and bit 30 now has other function
- Some bits of PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL moved and SF_PARTIAL_FRAME_UPDATE was
removed setting SU_REGION_START/END_ADDR will do this job
- SU_REGION_START/END_ADDR have now line granularity but will need to
be aligned with DSC when the PSRS + DSC support lands
BSpec: 50422
BSpec: 50424
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210625235600.765677-1-jose.souza@intel.com
The switch from old old IS_FOO_REVID() macros to the new table-based
IS_FOO_{GT,DISP}_STEP() macros is needed on both drm-intel-next (for
display-based DMC matching) and drm-intel-gt-next (for workaround
guards). To avoid conflicts, we'll apply the patches to a topic branch
and merge it to both intel branches to ensure the transition to the
new macros is clean.
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Most of the places are using this format so lets consolidate it.
v2:
- split patch in two: display and non-display because of conflicts
between drm-intel-gt-next x drm-intel-next
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210713003854.143197-1-jose.souza@intel.com
PSR2 is not compatible with DC3CO or VRR in this stepping, so not
enabling PSR2 if VRR will be enabled or not enabling DC3CO if PSR2 is
possible.
BSpec: 54369
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616203158.118111-5-jose.souza@intel.com
In some modes there is not enough time during hblank to transmit PSR2
SDP plus the pixels CRC SDP, if such case happens PSR2 needs to be
disabled.
But eDP spec 1.4b allows to transmit PSR2 SDP in a prior scanline
alone and than later the CRC SDP, allowing PSR2 to be enabled in
those hblank constrained modes.
BSpec: 49274
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616203158.118111-4-jose.souza@intel.com
The PSR2_CTL io buffer wake and fast wake values do not match
expected in pre production hardware, so here adding a table that
matches with HW to program it with values that HW expect.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616203158.118111-2-jose.souza@intel.com
We were only handling X and width granularity, what was causing issues
when sink had a granularity different than 4.
While at it, renaming su_x_granularity to su_w_granularity to better
match reality.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210616203158.118111-1-jose.souza@intel.com
This introduces the following function that can exit and activate a psr
source when intel_psr is already enabled.
- intel_psr_pause(): Pause current PSR. It deactivates current psr state.
- intel_psr_resume(): Resume paused PSR. It activates paused psr state.
v2: Address Jose's review comment.
- Remove unneeded changes around the intel_psr_enable().
- Add intel_psr_post_exit() which processes waiting until PSR is idle
and WA for SelectiveFetch.
v3: Address Jose's review comment.
- Rename intel_psr_post_exit() to intel_psr_wait_exit_locked().
- Move WA_1408330847 to intel_psr_disable_locked()
- If the PSR is paused by an explicit intel_psr_paused() call, make the
intel_psr_flush() not to activate PSR.
v4: Address Jose's review comment.
- In order to avoid the scenario of PSR is not active but there is a
scheduled psr->work, it changes the check routine of intel_psr_pause()
for PSR's enablement from "psr->active" to "psr->enable".
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210608085415.515342-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
It removes intel_crtc_state from function argument of
intel_psr_enable_source() in order to use intel_psr_enable_source()
without intel_crtc_state on other psr internal functions.
And we can get cpu_trancoder from intel_psr, therefore we don't need to
pass intel_crtc_state to this function.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210526000656.3060314-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
We are missing the implementation of some workarounds to enabled PSR2
in Alderlake P, so to avoid any CI report of issues around PSR2
disabling it until all PSR2 workarounds are implemented.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Clint Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210524214805.259692-5-jose.souza@intel.com
DC3CO is allowed in all the combinations between pipe and port A and B
on alderlake-P.
BSpec: 49196
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Clint Taylor <Clinton.A.Taylor@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210524214805.259692-4-jose.souza@intel.com
In order to reuse code of PSR interrupt error check on other PSR functions,
it adds psr_interrupt_error_check() function.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210519000625.3184321-13-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
It replaces dc3co_enabled with dc3co_exitline on intel_psr struct. And
it saves dc3co_exitline, not dc3co_enabled, so we can use dc3co_exitline
without intel_crtc_state on other psr internal function like as
intel_psr_enable_source().
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210519000625.3184321-12-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
So far if we had a mismatch between the state asked and what was
programmed in hardware for PSR, this mismatch would go unnoticed.
So here adding the PSR to the hardware configuration readout,
EDP_PSR_CTL and EDP_PSR2_CTL can't be directly read because its state
flips due to other factors like frontbuffer modifications and CRC.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210418002126.87882-1-jose.souza@intel.com
The implementation of two workarounds are missing causing failures
in CI with pre-production HW.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210505213801.80772-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Hoist the intel_de.h include from intel_display_types.h one
level up. I need this in order to untangle the include order
so that I can add tracepoints into intel_de.h.
This little cocci script did most of the work for me:
@find@
@@
(
intel_de_read(...)
|
intel_de_read_fw(...)
|
intel_de_write(...)
|
intel_de_write_fw(...)
)
@has_include@
@@
(
#include "intel_de.h"
|
#include "display/intel_de.h"
)
@depends on find && !has_include@
@@
+ #include "intel_de.h"
#include "intel_display_types.h"
@depends on find && !has_include@
@@
+ #include "display/intel_de.h"
#include "display/intel_display_types.h"
Cc: Cooper Chiou <cooper.chiou@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210430143945.6776-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
TGL PSR2 hardware tracking shows momentary flicker and screen shift if
TGL Display stepping is B1 from A0.
It has been fixed from TGL Display stepping C0.
HSDES: 18015970021
HSDES: 2209313811
BSpec: 55378
v2: Add checking of PSR2 manual tracking (Jose)
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210422160544.2427123-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
EDP_Y_COORDINATE_ENABLE became a reserved register in display 13.
EDP_Y_COORDINATE_VALID have the same fate as EDP_Y_COORDINATE_ENABLE
but as we don't need it, removing the macro definition of it.
BSpec: 50422
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210421220224.200729-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Gen to ver conversions across the driver
The main change is Lucas' series [1], with Ville's GLK fixes [2] and a
cherry-pick of Matt's commit [3] from drm-intel-next as a base to avoid
conflicts.
[1] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/88825/
[2] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/88938/
[3] 70bfb30743 ("drm/i915/display: Eliminate IS_GEN9_{BC,LP}")
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
# Conflicts:
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_ddi_buf_trans.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_fbc.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_gmbus.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdcp.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hdmi.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_pps.c
# drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/878s5ebny0.fsf@intel.com
Fix redundant condition, caught in cppcheck by kernel test robot.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Fixes: b64d6c5138 ("drm/i915/display: Support PSR Multiple Instances")
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Harish Chegondi <harish.chegondi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210409231738.238682-1-jose.souza@intel.com
While converting the rest of the driver to use GRAPHICS_VER() and
MEDIA_VER(), following what was done for display, some discussions went
back on what we did for display:
1) Why is the == comparison special that deserves a separate
macro instead of just getting the version and comparing directly
like is done for >, >=, <=?
2) IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() is weird in that it omits the "_VER" for
brevity. If we remove the current users of IS_DISPLAY_VER(), we
could actually repurpose it for a range check
With (1) there could be an advantage if we used gen_mask since multiple
conditionals be combined by the compiler in a single and instruction and
check the result. However a) INTEL_GEN() doesn't use the mask since it
would make the code bigger everywhere else and b) in the cases it made
sense, it also made sense to convert to the _RANGE() variant.
So here we repurpose IS_DISPLAY_VER() to work with a [ from, to ] range
like was the IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() and convert the current IS_DISPLAY_VER()
users to use == and != operators. Aside from the definition changes,
this was done by the following semantic patch:
@@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@
- !IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1)
+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) != E1
@@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@
- IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1)
+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == E1
@@ expression dev_priv, from, until; @@
- IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, from, until)
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
[Jani: Minor conflict resolve while applying.]
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210413051002.92589-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
This reverts commit 71c1a49983.
The proper fix is Wa_14013723622, so now we can revert this WA and
get back some power savings.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210408204917.254272-2-jose.souza@intel.com
PSR2 is defeatured for RKL and ADL-S, no important power impact as
those are desktop CPUs and PSR2 was not even enabled by default yet
in platforms without PSR2 HW tracking.
HSDES: 14011750631
HSDES: 14011741325
BSpec: 53273
Cc: Caz Yokoyama <Caz.Yokoyama@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210408214205.327704-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Use Coccinelle to convert most of the usage of INTEL_GEN() and IS_GEN()
in the display code to use DISPLAY_VER() comparisons instead. The
following semantic patch was used:
@@ expression dev_priv, E; @@
- INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) == E
+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E)
@@ expression dev_priv; @@
- INTEL_GEN(dev_priv)
+ DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv)
@@ expression dev_priv; expression E; @@
- IS_GEN(dev_priv, E)
+ IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E)
@@
expression dev_priv;
expression from, until;
@@
- IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
+ IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until)
There are still some display-related uses of INTEL_GEN() in intel_pm.c
(watermark code) and i915_irq.c. Those will be updated separately.
v2:
- Use new IS_DISPLAY_RANGE and IS_DISPLAY_VER helpers. (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210320044245.3920043-4-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Even though GEN12+ HW supports PSR + DC3CO, DMC's HW DC3CO exit mechanism
has an issue with using of Selective Fecth and PSR2 manual tracking.
And as some GEN12+ platforms (RKL, ADL-S) don't support PSR2 HW tracking,
Selective Fetch will be enabled by default on that platforms.
Therefore if the system enables PSR Selective Fetch / PSR manual tracking,
it does not allow DC3CO dc state, in that case.
When this DC3CO exit issue is addressed while PSR Selective Fetch is
enabled, this restriction should be removed.
v2: Address Jose's review comment.
- Fix typo
- Move check routine of DC3CO ability to
tgl_dc3co_exitline_compute_config()
v3: Change the check routine of enablement of psr2 sel fetch. (Jose)
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210222213006.1609085-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
This will set the right value of source_support when the port
encoder/port supports PSR but sink don't.
This change will also be needed in future for panel replay as psr
struct needs to be initialized even if disconnected or current sink
don't support PSR.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209181439.215104-4-jose.souza@intel.com
If source_support is set the platform supports PSR so no need to check
it again at every CAN_PSR().
Also removing the intel_dp_is_edp() calls, if sink_support is set
the sink connected is for sure a eDP panel.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209181439.215104-3-jose.souza@intel.com
There is no support for two pipes one transcoder for PSR and if we had
that the current code should not use cpu_transcoder.
Also I can't see a scenario where crtc_state->enable_psr2_sel_fetch is
set and PSR is not enabled and if by a bug it happens PSR HW will just
ignore any value in set in PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL.
So dropping all the rest and keeping the same behavior that we have
with intel_psr2_program_plane_sel_fetch().
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209181439.215104-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Right now CI is blacklisting module reload, so we need to be able to
enable PSR2 selective fetch in run time to test this feature before
enable it by default.
Changes in IGT will also be needed.
v2:
- Fixed handling of I915_PSR_DEBUG_ENABLE_SEL_FETCH in
intel_psr_debug_set()
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210209205036.351076-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Rework the plane init calls to do the gen test one level higher.
Rework some of the plane helpers so they can live in new file,
there is still some scope to clean up the plane/fb interactions
later.
v2: drop atomic code back, rename file to Ville suggestions,
add header file.
v3: move scaler bits back
v4: drop wrong new includes (Ville)
v5: integrate the ccs gen12 changes
v6: fix unrelated code movement (Ville)
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
[Jani: fixed up sparse warnings.]
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/4e88a5c6b9ab3b93cc2b6c7d78c26ae86f6abbd0.1612536383.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
While JSL and EHL eDP transcoder supports PSR2, the phy of this
platforms only supports eDP 1.3, so removing PSR2 support as this
feature was added in eDP 1.4.
Signed-off-by: Edmund Dea <edmund.j.dea@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204175830.97857-1-jose.souza@intel.com
It is a preliminary work for supporting multiple EDP PSR and
DP PanelReplay. And it refactors singleton PSR to Multi Transcoder
supportable PSR.
And this moves and renames the i915_psr structure of drm_i915_private's to
intel_dp's intel_psr structure.
It also causes changes in PSR interrupt handling routine for supporting
multiple transcoders. But it does not change the scenario and timing of
enabling and disabling PSR. And it not support multiple pipes with
a single transcoder PSR case yet.
v2: Fix indentation and add comments
v3: Remove Blank line
v4: Rebased
v5: Rebased and Addressed Anshuman's review comment.
- Move calling of intel_psr_init() to intel_dp_init_connector()
v6: Address Anshuman's review comments
- Remove wrong comments and add comments for a limit of supporting of
a single pipe PSR
v7: Update intel_psr_compute_config() for supporting multiple transcoder
PSR on BDW+
v8: Address Anshuman's review comments
- Replace DRM_DEBUG_KMS with drm_dbg_kms() / DRM_WARN with drm_warn()
v9: Fix commit message
v10: Rebased
v11: Address Jose's review comment.
- Reorder calling order of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl().
- In order to reduce changes keep the old name for drm_i915_private.
- Change restrictions of multiple instances of PSR.
v12: Address Jose's review comment.
- Change the calling of intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl() into
commit_pipe_config().
- Change a checking order of CAN_PSR() and connector_status to original
on i915_psr_sink_status_show().
- Drop unneeded intel_dp_update_pipe() function.
- In order to wait a specific encoder which belong to crtc_state on
intel_psr_wait_for_idle(), add checking of encoder.
- Add an whitespace to comments.
v13: Rebased and Address Jose's review comment.
- Add and use for_each_intel_psr_enabled_encoder() macro.
- In order to use correct frontbuffer_bit for each pipe,
fix intel_psr_invalidate() and intel_psr_flush().
- Remove redundant or unneeded codes.
- Update comments.
v14: Address Jose's review comment
- Add and use for_each_intel_encoder_can_psr() macro and
for_each_intel_encoder_mask_can_psr() macro.
- Add source_support member variable into intel_psr structure.
- Update CAN_PSR() macro that checks source_support.
- Move encoder's PSR availity check to psr_init() from
psr_compute_config().
- Remove redundant or unneeded codes.
v15: Remove wrong mutex lock/unlock of PSR from
intel_psr2_program_trans_man_trk_ctl()
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkila <juhapekka.heikkila@gmail.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210204134015.419036-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
Even though our HW supports PSR + VRR, the available panels
do not work reliably with PSR and VRR together. So if user
requested VRR and is supported by HW enable that and do not
enable PSR in that case.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210122232647.22688-7-manasi.d.navare@intel.com
Split out the DP aux functionality to a new intel_dp_aux.[ch]. This is a
surprisingly clean cut.
v2:
- Remove intel_dp_pack_aux declaration from intel_dp.h (Anshuman)
- Fixed some whitespace/comment checkpatch warnings
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210120101834.19813-4-jani.nikula@intel.com
TGL adds another level of indirection for applying WA based on stepping
information rather than PCI REVID. So change TGL_REVID enum into
stepping enum and use PCI REVID as index into revid to stepping table to
fetch correct display and GT stepping for application of WAs as
suggested by Matt Roper.
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Aditya Swarup <aditya.swarup@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210119192931.1116500-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
This reverts commit 0883ce8146. Originally
these quirks were added because of the issues with using the eDP
backlight interfaces on certain laptop panels, which made it impossible
to properly probe for DPCD backlight support without having a whitelist
for panels that we know have working VESA backlight control interfaces
over DPCD. As well, it should be noted it was impossible to use the
normal sink OUI for recognizing these panels as none of them actually
filled out their OUIs, hence needing to resort to checking EDIDs.
At the time we weren't really sure why certain panels had issues with
DPCD backlight controls, but we eventually figured out that there was a
second interface that these problematic laptop panels actually did work
with and advertise properly: Intel's proprietary backlight interface for
HDR panels. So far the testing we've done hasn't brought any panels to
light that advertise this interface and don't support it properly, which
means we finally have a real solution to this problem.
As a result, we now have no need for the force DPCD backlight quirk, and
furthermore this also removes the need for any kind of EDID quirk
checking in DRM. So, let's just revert it for now since we were the only
driver using this.
v3:
* Rebase
v2:
* Fix indenting error picked up by checkpatch in
intel_edp_init_connector()
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: thaytan@noraisin.net
Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114221709.2261452-6-lyude@redhat.com
It programs Plane's calculated x, y, offset to Plane SF register.
It does the calculation of x and y offsets using
skl_calc_main_surface_offset().
v3: Update commit message
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-4-jose.souza@intel.com
Now using plane damage clips property to calcualte the damaged area.
Selective fetch only supports one region to be fetched so software
needs to calculate a bounding box around all damage clips.
Now that we are not complete fetching each plane, there is another
loop needed as all the plane areas that intersect with the pipe
damaged area needs to be fetched from memory so the complete blending
of all planes can happen.
v2:
- do not shifting new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format
v4:
- setting plane selective fetch area using the whole pipe damage area
- mark the whole plane area damaged if plane visibility or alpha
changed
v5:
- taking in consideration src.y1 in the damage coordinates
- adding to the pipe damaged area planes that were visible but are
invisible in the new state
v6:
- consider old state plane coordinates when visibility changes or it
moved to calculate damaged area
- remove from damaged area the portion not in src clip
v7:
- intersec every damage clip with src to minimize damaged area
v8:
- adjust pipe_damaged area to 4 lines grouping
- adjust calculation now that is understood that uapi.src is the
framebuffer coordinates that plane will start to fetch from
v9:
- Only add plane dst or src to damaged_area if visible
- Early skip plane damage calculation if it was not visible in old and
new state
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210104205654.238928-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Add the calculations to set plane selective fetch registers depending
in the value of the area damaged.
It is still using the whole plane area as damaged but that will change
in next patches.
v2:
- fixed new_plane_state->uapi.dst.y2 typo in
intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update()
- do not shifthing new_plane_state->uapi.dst only src is in 16.16 format
BSpec: 55229
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201130125750.17820-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Replace the previous approach to force compute the initial PSR state
after i915 take over from firmware by the better and recently added
initial_fastset_check() hook.
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201102221048.104294-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Writes to CURSURFLIVE in TGL are causing IOMMU errors and visual
glitches that are often reproduced when executing CPU intensive
workloads while a eDP 4K panel is attached.
Manually exiting PSR causes the frontbuffer to be updated without
glitches and the IOMMU errors are also gone but this comes at the cost
of less time with PSR active.
So using this workaround until this issue is root caused and a better
fix is found.
The current code is already ready to enable PSR after this exit if
there is not other frontbuffer modifications.
Adding a new if block in psr_force_hw_tracking_exit() instead of reuse
the else/gen8- block because the plan is to revert this workaround
as soon as a better solution is found.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Tested-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201002231627.24528-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Another step towards PSR2 selective fetch, here programming plane
selective fetch registers and MAN_TRK_CTL enabling selective fetch but
for now it is fetching the whole area of the planes.
The damaged area calculation will come as next and final step.
v2:
- removed warn on when no plane is visible in state
- removed calculations using plane damaged area in
intel_psr2_program_plane_sel_fetch()
v3:
- do not shift 16 positions the plane dst coordinates, only src is
shifted
v4:
- only setting PLANE_SEL_FETCH_CTL_ENABLE and MCURSOR_MODE in
PLANE_SEL_FETCH_CTL
v5:
- not masking bits for cursor
BSpec: 55229
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007195238.53955-3-jose.souza@intel.com
Due to the debugfs flag, has_psr2 in CRTC state could have a different
value than psr.psr2_enabled and it was causing PSR2 subfeatures(DC3CO
and selective fetch) to be set to not a expected state.
So here only taking in consideration the parameter and debugfs flag
when computing PSR state, this way the CRTC state will also have
the correct state.
intel_psr_fastset_force() was already broken as
intel_psr_compute_config() was already only enabling PSR when
psr_global_enabled() and all other PSR requirements are met.
So some changes was required in this function, now it iterates over
all connectors, if it is a eDP connector and is active force a modeset
in the CRTC driving this connector, what will cause the new PSR state
to be set based on the debugfs flag.
v2:
- end connector iterator in error cases
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007195238.53955-2-jose.souza@intel.com
For platforms without selective fetch this register is reserved so
do not write 0 to it.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201007195238.53955-1-jose.souza@intel.com
TGL made stepping a litte mess, workarounds refer to the stepping of
the IP(GT or Display) not of the GPU stepping so it would already
require the same solution as used in commit 96c5a15f9f
("drm/i915/kbl: Fix revision ID checks").
But to make things even more messy it have a different IP stepping
mapping between SKUs and the same stepping revision of GT do not match
the same HW between TGL U/Y and regular TGL.
So it was required to have 2 different macros to check GT WAs while
for Display we are able to use just one macro that uses the right
revids table.
All TGL workarounds checked and updated accordingly.
v2:
- removed TODO to check if WA 14010919138 applies to regular TGL.
- fixed display stepping in regular TGL (Anusha)
BSpec: 52890
BSpec: 55378
BSpec: 44455
Reviewed-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivtsa@intel.com>
Cc: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com>
Cc: Penne Lee <penne.y.lee@intel.com>
Cc: Guangyao Bai <guangyao.bai@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200827233943.400946-1-jose.souza@intel.com
From the 3 WAs for PSR2 man track/selective fetch this is only one
needed when doing single full frames at every flip.
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200810174144.76761-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
All GEN12 platforms supports PSR2 selective fetch but not all GEN12
platforms supports PSR2 hardware tracking(aka RKL).
This feature consists in software programming registers with the
damaged area of each plane this way hardware will only fetch from
memory those areas and sent the PSR2 selective update blocks to panel,
saving even more power.
But as initial step it is only enabling the full frame fetch at
every flip, the actual selective fetch part will come in a future
patch.
Also this is only handling the page flip side, it is still completely
missing frontbuffer modifications, that is why the
enable_psr2_sel_fetch parameter was added.
v3:
- calling intel_psr2_sel_fetch_update() during the atomic check phase
(Ville)
BSpec: 55229
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200810174144.76761-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
We have a mix of dport, intel_dport, intel_dig_port and dig_port to
reference a intel_digital_port struct. Numbers are around
5 intel_dport
36 dport
479 intel_dig_port
352 dig_port
Since we already removed the intel_ prefix from most of our other
structs, do the same here and prefer dig_port.
v2: rename everything in i915, not just a few display sources and
reword commit message (from Matt Roper)
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200701045054.23357-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Future patches will bring PSR2 selective fetch configuration
validation but most of the configuration checks will be used for HW
tracking and selective fetch so the reoder was necessary.
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200626010151.221388-2-jose.souza@intel.com
Start using device specific parameters instead of module parameters for
most things. The module parameters become the immutable initial values
for i915 parameters. The device specific parameters in i915->params
start life as a copy of i915_modparams. Any later changes are only
reflected in the debugfs.
The stragglers are:
* i915.force_probe and i915.modeset. Needed before dev_priv is
available. This is fine because the parameters are read-only and never
modified.
* i915.verbose_state_checks. Passing dev_priv to I915_STATE_WARN and
I915_STATE_WARN_ON would result in massive and ugly churn. This is
handled by not exposing the parameter via debugfs, and leaving the
parameter writable in sysfs. This may be fixed up in follow-up work.
* i915.inject_probe_failure. Only makes sense in terms of the module,
not the device. This is handled by not exposing the parameter via
debugfs.
v2: Fix uc i915 lookup code (Michał Winiarski)
Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkilä <juha-pekka.heikkila@intel.com>
Cc: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200618150402.14022-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
The IO buffer Wake and Fast Wake bit size and value have been changed from
Gen12+. It programs the default value of IO buffer Wake and Fast Wake on
Gen12+. It adds definitions of IO buffer Wake and Fast Wake for pre Gen12
and Gen12+. And it aligns PSR2 definition macros.
v2: Fix macro definitions. (José)
v3: Addressed review comments from José
- Add missing default values of IO_BUFFER_WAKE and FAST_WAKE for GEN9+
- Change a style of macro naming in order to use lines as input.
- Update Todo comments.
v4: Add parentheses to macros to avoid precedence issues.
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200607143614.185246-1-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
This parameter is meant to be used when PSR issues are found as some
issues in the past was due wrong values set in VBT so this would be
a quick and easy way to ask users or for us to check if the issue is
due VBT values.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200520212756.354623-1-jose.souza@intel.com
RKL doesn't have PSR2 HW tracking, it was replaced by software/manual
tracking. The driver is required to track the areas that needs update
and program hardware to send selective updates.
So until the software tracking is implemented, PSR2 needs to be disabled
for platforms without PSR2 HW tracking.
BSpec: 50422
BSpec: 50424
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200603211529.3005059-15-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
In order to use a common VSC SDP Colorimetry calculating code on PSR,
it uses a new psr vsc sdp compute routine.
Because PSR routine has its own scenario and timings of writing a VSC SDP,
the current PSR routine needs to have its own drm_dp_vsc_sdp structure
member variable on struct i915_psr.
In order to calculate colorimetry information, intel_psr_update()
function and intel_psr_enable() function extend a drm_connector_state
argument.
There are no changes to PSR mechanism.
v3: Replace a structure name to drm_dp_vsc_sdp from intel_dp_vsc_sdp
v4: Rebased
v8: Rebased
v10: When a PSR is enabled, it needs to add DP_SDP_VSC to
infoframes.enable.
It is needed for comparing between HW and pipe_state of VSC_SDP.
v11: If PSR is disabled by flag, it don't enable psr on pipe compute.
v12: Fix an inconsistent indenting
Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200514060732.3378396-15-gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com
The whole point of using OUIs is so that we can recognize certain
devices and potentially apply quirks for them. Normally this should work
quite well, but there appears to be quite a number of laptop panels out
there that will fill the OUI but not the device ID. As such, for devices
like this I can't imagine it's a very good idea to try relying on OUIs
for applying quirks. As well, some laptop vendors have confirmed to us
that their panels have this exact issue.
So, let's introduce the ability to apply DP quirks based on EDID
identification. We reuse the same quirk bits for OUI-based quirks, so
that callers can simply check all possible quirks using
drm_dp_has_quirk().
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200211183358.157448-2-lyude@redhat.com
Commit 60c6a14b48 ("drm/i915/display: Force the state compute phase
once to enable PSR") was forcing the state compute too earlier
causing errors because not everything was initialized, so here
moving to the end of i915_driver_modeset_probe() when the display is
all initialized.
Also fixing the place where it disarm the force probe as during the
atomic check phase errors could happen like the ones due locking and
it would cause PSR to never be enabled if that happens.
Leaving the disarm to the atomic commit phase, intel_psr_enable() or
intel_psr_update() will be called even if the current state do not
allow PSR to be enabled.
v2: Check if intel_dp is null in intel_psr_force_mode_changed_set()
v3: Check intel_dp before get dev_priv
v4:
- renamed intel_psr_force_mode_changed_set() to
intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed()
- removed the set parameter from intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed()
- not calling intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() from
intel_psr_enable/update(), directly setting it after the same checks
that intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() does
- moved intel_psr_set_force_mode_changed() arm call to
i915_driver_modeset_probe() as it is a better for a PSR call, all the
functions calls happening between the old and the new function call
will cause issue
Fixes: 60c6a14b48 ("drm/i915/display: Force the state compute phase once to enable PSR")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1151
Tested-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
Reported-by: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200221212635.11614-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Add a basic description about how DC3CO works to help people not
familiar with it.
While at it, I also improved the delayed work handle and function
names and removed a debug message that is ambiguous and not much
useful, no changes in behavior here.
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200205214945.131012-1-jose.souza@intel.com
A recent change in BSpec allow us to change EXTLINE while transcoder
is enabled so this allow us to change it even when doing the first
fastset after taking over previous hardware state set by BIOS.
BIOS don't enable PSR, so if sink supports PSR it will be enabled on
the first fastset, so moving the EXTLINE compute and set to PSR flows
allow us to simplfy a bunch of code.
This will save a lot of time in all the IGT tests that uses CRC, as
when PSR2 is enabled CRCs are not generated, so we switch to PSR1, so
the previous code would compute dc3co_exitline=0 causing a full
modeset that would shutdown pipe, enable and train link.
v2: only programming EXTLINE when DC3CO is enabled
BSpec: 49196
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200122182617.18597-2-jose.souza@intel.com
This will calculaet the DC3CO exit delay only once per full modeset.
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200122182617.18597-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Both activate functions and the dc3co disable function were doing the
same thing, so better move to a function and share.
Also while at it adding a WARN_ON to catch invalid values.
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200113214603.52158-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Recent improvements in the state tracking in i915 caused PSR to not be
enabled when reusing firmware/BIOS modeset, this is due to all initial
commits returning ealier in intel_atomic_check() as needs_modeset()
is always false.
To fix that here forcing the state compute phase in CRTC that is
driving the eDP that supports PSR once. Enable or disable PSR do not
require a fullmodeset, so user will still experience glitch free boot
process plus the power savings that PSR brings.
It was tried to set mode_changed in intel_initial_commit() but at
this point the connectors are not registered causing a crash when
computing encoder state.
v2:
- removed function return
- change arguments to match intel_hdcp_atomic_check
v3:
- replaced drm includes in intel_psr.h by forward declaration(Jani)
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112253
Reported-by: <s.zharkoff@gmail.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200106152128.195171-1-jose.souza@intel.com
eDP specification states that sink can have its PSR capability
changed, I have never found any panel doing that but lets add that
for completeness.
For now it is not reading back the PSR capabilities and if possible
re-enabling PSR, this will be added if a panel is found using this
feature.
v4:
Cleaning DP_PSR_CAPS_CHANGE
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128014852.214135-4-jose.souza@intel.com
When this error happens sink link is not stable after the required
FW_EXIT_LATENCY period so it will miss the selective update.
As the other PSR errors, for now we are not trying to recover from
it.
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128014852.214135-3-jose.souza@intel.com
eDP spec states that when sink enconters a problem that prevents it
to keep PSR running it should set PSR status to internal error and
set the reason why it happen to PSR_ERROR_STATUS but it is not how it
was implemented.
But also I don't want to change this behavior, who knows if there is
a panel out there that only set the PSR_ERROR_STATUS.
So here refactoring the code a bit to make more easy to read what was
state above as more checks will be added to this function.
v2:
returning a int instead of a bool in psr_get_status_and_error_status()
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128014852.214135-2-jose.souza@intel.com
PSR2 HW only support a limited number of bits per pixel, if mode has
more than supported PSR2 should not be enabled.
BSpec: 50422
BSpec: 7713
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128014852.214135-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Split up crtc_state->base to uapi. This is done using the following patch,
ran after the previous commit that splits out any hw references:
@@
struct intel_crtc_state *T;
@@
-T->base
+T->uapi
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191031112610.27608-5-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Split up crtc_state->base to hw where appropriate. This is done using the following patch:
@@
struct intel_crtc_state *T;
identifier x =~ "^(active|enable|degamma_lut|gamma_lut|ctm|mode|adjusted_mode)$";
@@
-T->base.x
+T->hw.x
@@
struct drm_crtc_state *T;
identifier x =~ "^(active|enable|degamma_lut|gamma_lut|ctm|mode|adjusted_mode)$";
@@
-to_intel_crtc_state(T)->base.x
+to_intel_crtc_state(T)->hw.x
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191031112610.27608-4-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
We are still looking at drm_crtc_state in a few places, convert those
to use intel_crtc_state instead.
Changes since v1:
- Move to before uapi/hw split.
- Add hunks for intel_pm.c as well.
Changes since v2:
- Incorporate Ville's feedback.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191031112610.27608-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
'Link CRC error' will now have same error level as
other PSR2 errors like 'RFB storage error' and
'VSC SDP uncorrectable error'.
Signed-off-by: Ap Kamal <kamal.ap@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1571819128-3264-1-git-send-email-kamal.ap@intel.com
Reduce verbosity in code by renaming dsc_params member of crtc state to
simply dsc. There is enough context for this to be clear. No functional
changes.
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191022133414.8293-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
DC3CO is useful power state, when DMC detects PSR2 idle frame
while an active video playback, playing 30fps video on 60hz panel
is the classic example of this use case.
B.Specs:49196 has a restriction to enable DC3CO only for Video Playback.
It will be worthy to enable DC3CO after completion of each pageflip
and switch back to DC5 when display is idle because driver doesn't
differentiate between video playback and a normal pageflip.
We will use Frontbuffer flush call tgl_dc3co_flush() to enable DC3CO
state only for ORIGIN_FLIP flush call, because DC3CO state has primarily
targeted for VPB use case. We are not interested here for frontbuffer
invalidates calls because that triggers PSR2 exit, which will
explicitly disable DC3CO.
DC5 and DC6 saves more power, but can't be entered during video
playback because there are not enough idle frames in a row to meet
most PSR2 panel deep sleep entry requirement typically 4 frames.
As PSR2 existing implementation is using minimum 6 idle frames for
deep sleep, it is safer to enable DC5/6 after 6 idle frames
(By scheduling a delayed work of 6 idle frames, once DC3CO has been
enabled after a pageflip).
After manually waiting for 6 idle frames DC5/6 will be enabled and
PSR2 deep sleep idle frames will be restored to 6 idle frames, at this
point DMC will triggers DC5/6 once PSR2 enters to deep sleep after
6 idle frames.
In future when we will enable S/W PSR2 tracking, we can change the
PSR2 required deep sleep idle frames to 1 so DMC can trigger the
DC5/6 immediately after S/W manual waiting of 6 idle frames get
complete.
v2: calculated s/w state to switch over dc3co when there is an
update. [Imre]
Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in order to avoid any race
with already scheduled delayed work. [Imre]
v3: Cancel_delayed_work_sync() may blocked the commit work.
hence dropping it, dc5_idle_thread() checks the valid wakeref before
putting the reference count, which avoids any chances of dropping
a zero wakeref. [Imre (IRC)]
v4: Used frontbuffer flush mechanism. [Imre]
v5: Used psr.pipe to extract frontbuffer busy bits. [Imre]
Used cancel_delayed_work_sync() in encoder disable path. [Imre]
Used mod_delayed_work() instead of cancelling and scheduling a
delayed work. [Imre]
Used psr.lock in tgl_dc5_idle_thread() to enable psr2 deep
sleep. [Imre]
Removed DC5_REQ_IDLE_FRAMES macro. [Imre]
v6: Used dc3co_exitline check instead of TGL and dc3co allowed_dc_mask
checks, used delayed_work_pending with the psr lock and removed the
psr2_deep_slp_disabled flag. [Imre]
v7: Code refactoring, moved most of functional code to inte_psr.c [Imre]
Using frontbuffer_bits on psr.pipe check instead of
busy_frontbuffer_bits. [Imre]
Calculating dc3co_exit_delay in intel_psr_enable_locked. [Imre]
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191003081738.22101-6-anshuman.gupta@intel.com
For older gens PSR IIR and IMR have fixed addresses. From TGL onwards those
registers moved to each transcoder offset. The bits for the registers
are defined without an offset per transcoder as right now we have one
register per transcoder. So add a fake "trans_shift" when calculating
the bits offsets: it will be 0 for gen12+ and psr.transcoder otherwise.
v2 (Lucas): change the implementation to use trans_shift instead of
getting each bit value with a different macro
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190904213419.27547-3-jose.souza@intel.com
It was enabling and checking PSR interruptions in every transcoder
while it should keep the interruptions on the non-used transcoders
masked.
While doing this it gives us trouble on Tiger Lake if we are
reading/writing to registers of disabled transcoders since from gen12
onwards the registers are relative to the transcoder. Instead of forcing
them ON to access those registers, just avoid the accesses as they are
not needed.
v2 (Lucas):
- Explain why we can't keep accessing all transcoders
- Remove TODO about extending the irq handling to multiple instances:
when/if implementing multiple instances it's pretty clear by the
singleton psr that it needs to be extended
- Fix intel_psr_debug_set() calling psr_irq_control() with
psr.transcoder not set yet (from Imre). Now we only set the debug
register right away if psr is already enabled. Otherwise we just
record the value to be set when enabling the source.
- Do not depend on the value of TRANSCODER_A. Just be relative to it
(from Imre)
- handle psr error last so we don't schedule the work before handling
the other flags
v3:
- Adding a warning about setting reserverd bits on EDP_PSR_IMR
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190904213419.27547-2-jose.souza@intel.com
According to BSpc if link standby is set on TGL+, PSR will not be
enabled. Vendors should not use panels that requires link standby and
even if they do, panel should assert a PSR error that will cause PSR to
be disabled.
BSpec: 50434
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190823082055.5992-8-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Jouni Högander
Andrzej Hajda
José Roberto de Souza
Jani Nikula
Tom Rix
Ville Syrjälä
Gwan-gyeong Mun
Matt Roper
Anusha Srivatsa
Rodrigo Vivi
Lucas De Marchi
Dave Airlie
Edmund Dea
Manasi Navare
Aditya Swarup
Lyude Paul
Imre Deak
Wambui Karuga
Pankaj Bharadiya
Maarten Lankhorst
Ap Kamal
Anshuman Gupta