mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
65 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
Kirill A. Shutemov
|
cdd85786f4 |
x86/tdx: Clarify RIP adjustments in #VE handler
After successful #VE handling, tdx_handle_virt_exception() has to move RIP to the next instruction. The handler needs to know the length of the instruction. If the #VE happened due to instruction execution, the GET_VEINFO TDX module call provides info on the instruction in R10, including its length. For #VE due to EPT violation, the info in R10 is not populand and the kernel must decode the instruction manually to find out its length. Restructure the code to make it explicit that the instruction length depends on the type of #VE. Make individual #VE handlers return the instruction length on success or -errno on failure. [ dhansen: fix up changelog and comments ] Suggested-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220614120135.14812-3-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com |
|
|
Kirill A. Shutemov
|
60428d8bc2 |
x86/tdx: Fix early #VE handling
tdx_early_handle_ve() does not increment RIP after successfully
handling the exception. That leads to infinite loop of exceptions.
Move RIP when exceptions are successfully handled.
[ dhansen: make problem statement more clear ]
Fixes:
|
|
|
Kirill A. Shutemov
|
7dbde76316 |
x86/mm/cpa: Add support for TDX shared memory
Intel TDX protects guest memory from VMM access. Any memory that is required for communication with the VMM must be explicitly shared. It is a two-step process: the guest sets the shared bit in the page table entry and notifies VMM about the change. The notification happens using MapGPA hypercall. Conversion back to private memory requires clearing the shared bit, notifying VMM with MapGPA hypercall following with accepting the memory with AcceptPage hypercall. Provide a TDX version of x86_platform.guest.* callbacks. It makes __set_memory_enc_pgtable() work right in TDX guest. Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-27-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com |
|
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
|
cfb8ec7a31 |
x86/tdx: Wire up KVM hypercalls
KVM hypercalls use the VMCALL or VMMCALL instructions. Although the ABI is similar, those instructions no longer function for TDX guests. Make vendor-specific TDVMCALLs instead of VMCALL. This enables TDX guests to run with KVM acting as the hypervisor. Among other things, KVM hypercall is used to send IPIs. Since the KVM driver can be built as a kernel module, export tdx_kvm_hypercall() to make the symbols visible to kvm.ko. Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-20-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com |
|
Andi Kleen
|
32e72854fa |
x86/tdx: Port I/O: Add early boot support
TDX guests cannot do port I/O directly. The TDX module triggers a #VE exception to let the guest kernel emulate port I/O by converting them into TDCALLs to call the host. But before IDT handlers are set up, port I/O cannot be emulated using normal kernel #VE handlers. To support the #VE-based emulation during this boot window, add a minimal early #VE handler support in early exception handlers. This is similar to what AMD SEV does. This is mainly to support earlyprintk's serial driver, as well as potentially the VGA driver. The early handler only supports I/O-related #VE exceptions. Unhandled or failed exceptions will be handled via early_fixup_exceptions() (like normal exception failures). At runtime I/O-related #VE exceptions (along with other types) handled by virt_exception_kernel(). Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-19-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com |
|
|
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
|
0314994883 |
x86/tdx: Port I/O: Add runtime hypercalls
TDX hypervisors cannot emulate instructions directly. This includes port I/O which is normally emulated in the hypervisor. All port I/O instructions inside TDX trigger the #VE exception in the guest and would be normally emulated there. Use a hypercall to emulate port I/O. Extend the tdx_handle_virt_exception() and add support to handle the #VE due to port I/O instructions. String I/O operations are not supported in TDX. Unroll them by declaring CC_ATTR_GUEST_UNROLL_STRING_IO confidential computing attribute. == Userspace Implications == The ioperm() facility allows userspace access to I/O instructions like inb/outb. Among other things, this allows writing userspace device drivers. This series has no special handling for ioperm(). Users will be able to successfully request I/O permissions but will induce a #VE on their first I/O instruction which leads SIGSEGV. If this is undesirable users can enable kernel lockdown feature with 'lockdown=integrity' kernel command line option. It makes ioperm() fail. More robust handling of this situation (denying ioperm() in all TDX guests) will be addressed in follow-on work. Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-18-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com |
|
|
Kirill A. Shutemov
|
31d58c4e55 |
x86/tdx: Handle in-kernel MMIO
In non-TDX VMs, MMIO is implemented by providing the guest a mapping
which will cause a VMEXIT on access and then the VMM emulating the
instruction that caused the VMEXIT. That's not possible for TDX VM.
To emulate an instruction an emulator needs two things:
- R/W access to the register file to read/modify instruction arguments
and see RIP of the faulted instruction.
- Read access to memory where instruction is placed to see what to
emulate. In this case it is guest kernel text.
Both of them are not available to VMM in TDX environment:
- Register file is never exposed to VMM. When a TD exits to the module,
it saves registers into the state-save area allocated for that TD.
The module then scrubs these registers before returning execution
control to the VMM, to help prevent leakage of TD state.
- TDX does not allow guests to execute from shared memory. All executed
instructions are in TD-private memory. Being private to the TD, VMMs
have no way to access TD-private memory and no way to read the
instruction to decode and emulate it.
In TDX the MMIO regions are instead configured by VMM to trigger a #VE
exception in the guest.
Add #VE handling that emulates the MMIO instruction inside the guest and
converts it into a controlled hypercall to the host.
This approach is bad for performance. But, it has (virtually) no impact
on the size of the kernel image and will work for a wide variety of
drivers. This allows TDX deployments to use arbitrary devices and device
drivers, including virtio. TDX customers have asked for the capability
to use random devices in their deployments.
In other words, even if all of the work was done to paravirtualize all
x86 MMIO users and virtio, this approach would still be needed. There
is essentially no way to get rid of this code.
This approach is functional for all in-kernel MMIO users current and
future and does so with a minimal amount of code and kernel image bloat.
MMIO addresses can be used with any CPU instruction that accesses
memory. Address only MMIO accesses done via io.h helpers, such as
'readl()' or 'writeq()'.
Any CPU instruction that accesses memory can also be used to access
MMIO. However, by convention, MMIO access are typically performed via
io.h helpers such as 'readl()' or 'writeq()'.
The io.h helpers intentionally use a limited set of instructions when
accessing MMIO. This known, limited set of instructions makes MMIO
instruction decoding and emulation feasible in KVM hosts and SEV guests
today.
MMIO accesses performed without the io.h helpers are at the mercy of the
compiler. Compilers can and will generate a much more broad set of
instructions which can not practically be decoded and emulated. TDX
guests will oops if they encounter one of these decoding failures.
This means that TDX guests *must* use the io.h helpers to access MMIO.
This requirement is not new. Both KVM hosts and AMD SEV guests have the
same limitations on MMIO access.
=== Potential alternative approaches ===
== Paravirtualizing all MMIO ==
An alternative to letting MMIO induce a #VE exception is to avoid
the #VE in the first place. Similar to the port I/O case, it is
theoretically possible to paravirtualize MMIO accesses.
Like the exception-based approach offered here, a fully paravirtualized
approach would be limited to MMIO users that leverage common
infrastructure like the io.h macros.
However, any paravirtual approach would be patching approximately 120k
call sites. Any paravirtual approach would need to replace a bare memory
access instruction with (at least) a function call. With a conservative
overhead estimation of 5 bytes per call site (CALL instruction),
it leads to bloating code by 600k.
Many drivers will never be used in the TDX environment and the bloat
cannot be justified.
== Patching TDX drivers ==
Rather than touching the entire kernel, it might also be possible to
just go after drivers that use MMIO in TDX guests *and* are performance
critical to justify the effrort. Right now, that's limited only to virtio.
All virtio MMIO appears to be done through a single function, which
makes virtio eminently easy to patch.
This approach will be adopted in the future, removing the bulk of
MMIO #VEs. The #VE-based MMIO will remain serving non-virtio use cases.
Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-12-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
|
|
|
Kirill A. Shutemov
|
c141fa2c2b |
x86/tdx: Handle CPUID via #VE
In TDX guests, most CPUID leaf/sub-leaf combinations are virtualized by the TDX module while some trigger #VE. Implement the #VE handling for EXIT_REASON_CPUID by handing it through the hypercall, which in turn lets the TDX module handle it by invoking the host VMM. More details on CPUID Virtualization can be found in the TDX module specification, the section titled "CPUID Virtualization". Note that VMM that handles the hypercall is not trusted. It can return data that may steer the guest kernel in wrong direct. Only allow VMM to control range reserved for hypervisor communication. Return all-zeros for any CPUID outside the hypervisor range. It matches CPU behaviour for non-supported leaf. Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-11-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com |
|
|
Kirill A. Shutemov
|
ae87f609cd |
x86/tdx: Add MSR support for TDX guests
Use hypercall to emulate MSR read/write for the TDX platform. There are two viable approaches for doing MSRs in a TD guest: 1. Execute the RDMSR/WRMSR instructions like most VMs and bare metal do. Some will succeed, others will cause a #VE. All of those that cause a #VE will be handled with a TDCALL. 2. Use paravirt infrastructure. The paravirt hook has to keep a list of which MSRs would cause a #VE and use a TDCALL. All other MSRs execute RDMSR/WRMSR instructions directly. The second option can be ruled out because the list of MSRs was challenging to maintain. That leaves option #1 as the only viable solution for the minimal TDX support. Kernel relies on the exception fixup machinery to handle MSR access errors. #VE handler uses the same exception fixup code as #GP. It covers MSR accesses along with other types of fixups. For performance-critical MSR writes (like TSC_DEADLINE), future patches will replace the WRMSR/#VE sequence with the direct TDCALL. RDMSR and WRMSR specification details can be found in Guest-Host-Communication Interface (GHCI) for Intel Trust Domain Extensions (Intel TDX) specification, sec titled "TDG.VP. VMCALL<Instruction.RDMSR>" and "TDG.VP.VMCALL<Instruction.WRMSR>". Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-10-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com |
|
|
Kirill A. Shutemov
|
bfe6ed0c67 |
x86/tdx: Add HLT support for TDX guests
The HLT instruction is a privileged instruction, executing it stops instruction execution and places the processor in a HALT state. It is used in kernel for cases like reboot, idle loop and exception fixup handlers. For the idle case, interrupts will be enabled (using STI) before the HLT instruction (this is also called safe_halt()). To support the HLT instruction in TDX guests, it needs to be emulated using TDVMCALL (hypercall to VMM). More details about it can be found in Intel Trust Domain Extensions (Intel TDX) Guest-Host-Communication Interface (GHCI) specification, section TDVMCALL[Instruction.HLT]. In TDX guests, executing HLT instruction will generate a #VE, which is used to emulate the HLT instruction. But #VE based emulation will not work for the safe_halt() flavor, because it requires STI instruction to be executed just before the TDCALL. Since idle loop is the only user of safe_halt() variant, handle it as a special case. To avoid *safe_halt() call in the idle function, define the tdx_guest_idle() and use it to override the "x86_idle" function pointer for a valid TDX guest. Alternative choices like PV ops have been considered for adding safe_halt() support. But it was rejected because HLT paravirt calls only exist under PARAVIRT_XXL, and enabling it in TDX guest just for safe_halt() use case is not worth the cost. Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-9-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com |
|
|
Kirill A. Shutemov
|
9a22bf6deb |
x86/traps: Add #VE support for TDX guest
Virtualization Exceptions (#VE) are delivered to TDX guests due to specific guest actions which may happen in either user space or the kernel: * Specific instructions (WBINVD, for example) * Specific MSR accesses * Specific CPUID leaf accesses * Access to specific guest physical addresses Syscall entry code has a critical window where the kernel stack is not yet set up. Any exception in this window leads to hard to debug issues and can be exploited for privilege escalation. Exceptions in the NMI entry code also cause issues. Returning from the exception handler with IRET will re-enable NMIs and nested NMI will corrupt the NMI stack. For these reasons, the kernel avoids #VEs during the syscall gap and the NMI entry code. Entry code paths do not access TD-shared memory, MMIO regions, use #VE triggering MSRs, instructions, or CPUID leaves that might generate #VE. VMM can remove memory from TD at any point, but access to unaccepted (or missing) private memory leads to VM termination, not to #VE. Similarly to page faults and breakpoints, #VEs are allowed in NMI handlers once the kernel is ready to deal with nested NMIs. During #VE delivery, all interrupts, including NMIs, are blocked until TDGETVEINFO is called. It prevents #VE nesting until the kernel reads the VE info. TDGETVEINFO retrieves the #VE info from the TDX module, which also clears the "#VE valid" flag. This must be done before anything else as any #VE that occurs while the valid flag is set escalates to #DF by TDX module. It will result in an oops. Virtual NMIs are inhibited if the #VE valid flag is set. NMI will not be delivered until TDGETVEINFO is called. For now, convert unhandled #VE's (everything, until later in this series) so that they appear just like a #GP by calling the ve_raise_fault() directly. The ve_raise_fault() function is similar to #GP handler and is responsible for sending SIGSEGV to userspace and CPU die and notifying debuggers and other die chain users. Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-8-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com |
|
|
Kirill A. Shutemov
|
65fab5bc03 |
x86/tdx: Exclude shared bit from __PHYSICAL_MASK
In TDX guests, by default memory is protected from host access. If a guest needs to communicate with the VMM (like the I/O use case), it uses a single bit in the physical address to communicate the protected/shared attribute of the given page. In the x86 ARCH code, __PHYSICAL_MASK macro represents the width of the physical address in the given architecture. It is used in creating physical PAGE_MASK for address bits in the kernel. Since in TDX guest, a single bit is used as metadata, it needs to be excluded from valid physical address bits to avoid using incorrect addresses bits in the kernel. Enable DYNAMIC_PHYSICAL_MASK to support updating the __PHYSICAL_MASK. Co-developed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-6-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com |
|
|
Kirill A. Shutemov
|
41394e33f3 |
x86/tdx: Extend the confidential computing API to support TDX guests
Confidential Computing (CC) features (like string I/O unroll support, memory encryption/decryption support, etc) are conditionally enabled in the kernel using cc_platform_has() API. Since TDX guests also need to use these CC features, extend cc_platform_has() API and add TDX guest-specific CC attributes support. CC API also provides an interface to deal with encryption mask. Extend it to cover TDX. Details about which bit in the page table entry to be used to indicate shared/private state is determined by using the TDINFO TDCALL. Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-5-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com |
|
|
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
|
eb94f1b6a7 |
x86/tdx: Add __tdx_module_call() and __tdx_hypercall() helper functions
Guests communicate with VMMs with hypercalls. Historically, these are implemented using instructions that are known to cause VMEXITs like VMCALL, VMLAUNCH, etc. However, with TDX, VMEXITs no longer expose the guest state to the host. This prevents the old hypercall mechanisms from working. So, to communicate with VMM, TDX specification defines a new instruction called TDCALL. In a TDX based VM, since the VMM is an untrusted entity, an intermediary layer -- TDX module -- facilitates secure communication between the host and the guest. TDX module is loaded like a firmware into a special CPU mode called SEAM. TDX guests communicate with the TDX module using the TDCALL instruction. A guest uses TDCALL to communicate with both the TDX module and VMM. The value of the RAX register when executing the TDCALL instruction is used to determine the TDCALL type. A leaf of TDCALL used to communicate with the VMM is called TDVMCALL. Add generic interfaces to communicate with the TDX module and VMM (using the TDCALL instruction). __tdx_module_call() - Used to communicate with the TDX module (via TDCALL instruction). __tdx_hypercall() - Used by the guest to request services from the VMM (via TDVMCALL leaf of TDCALL). Also define an additional wrapper _tdx_hypercall(), which adds error handling support for the TDCALL failure. The __tdx_module_call() and __tdx_hypercall() helper functions are implemented in assembly in a .S file. The TDCALL ABI requires shuffling arguments in and out of registers, which proved to be awkward with inline assembly. Just like syscalls, not all TDVMCALL use cases need to use the same number of argument registers. The implementation here picks the current worst-case scenario for TDCALL (4 registers). For TDCALLs with fewer than 4 arguments, there will end up being a few superfluous (cheap) instructions. But, this approach maximizes code reuse. For registers used by the TDCALL instruction, please check TDX GHCI specification, the section titled "TDCALL instruction" and "TDG.VP.VMCALL Interface". Based on previous patch by Sean Christopherson. Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-4-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com |
|
|
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
|
59bd54a84d |
x86/tdx: Detect running as a TDX guest in early boot
In preparation of extending cc_platform_has() API to support TDX guest, use CPUID instruction to detect support for TDX guests in the early boot code (via tdx_early_init()). Since copy_bootdata() is the first user of cc_platform_has() API, detect the TDX guest status before it. Define a synthetic feature flag (X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST) and set this bit in a valid TDX guest platform. Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405232939.73860-2-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com |