- Fix undefined reference to `intel_pxp_gsccs_is_ready_for_sessions'
Display related:
- More work towards display separation (Jani)
- Stop writing VRR_CTL_IGN_MAX_SHIFT for MTL onwards (Jouni)
- DSC checks for 3 engines (Ankit)
- Add link rate and lane count to i915_display_info (Khaled)
- PSR fixes and workaround for underrun on idle (Jouni)
- LOBF enablement and ALMP fixes (Animesh)
- Clean up VGA plane handling (Ville)
- Use an intel_connector pointer everywhere (Imre)
- Fix warning for coffeelake on SunrisePoint PCH (Jiajia)
- Rework/Correction on minimum hblank calculation (Arun)
- Dmesg clean up (Jani)
- Add a couple of simple display workarounds (Ankit, Vinod)
- Refactor HDCP GSC (Jani)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEbSBwaO7dZQkcLOKj+mJfZA7rE8oFAmgcsdUACgkQ+mJfZA7r
E8rYqAf/citknZ0aTAOw7+O8581v6/27BsmRYO8T2JvhHWr3RIOeowgyEQ9M3m6y
jBM5qIsGH0JOrDMVDjvuVlfm+JAPRxVABo3GXTpUIu94xszwco+5iQNnHBui0NrP
AnAauh/MZC6YKmTzNVBHW35N+JQJ9clmK6Rf5Bzb8pVP1bPRwRFSpgefHBeimRRY
qeQlqEVfvst5gkQiTe2b/5ydErPB7WfBY4WHGrgykBPt0+3t7Zln3Dqbdm9vB7+p
zEHXQNvX75KGFimUgCf7mU2Hoov0LI1/cazeG1dbv6gczXOUySwIKRIuqKNJ6XsG
PSV0X8Hc1ppL4Sp1Oe/WAdwE2k/xxw==
=rvsI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'drm-intel-next-2025-05-08' of https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/i915/kernel into drm-next
Non-display related:
- Fix undefined reference to `intel_pxp_gsccs_is_ready_for_sessions'
Display related:
- More work towards display separation (Jani)
- Stop writing VRR_CTL_IGN_MAX_SHIFT for MTL onwards (Jouni)
- DSC checks for 3 engines (Ankit)
- Add link rate and lane count to i915_display_info (Khaled)
- PSR fixes and workaround for underrun on idle (Jouni)
- LOBF enablement and ALMP fixes (Animesh)
- Clean up VGA plane handling (Ville)
- Use an intel_connector pointer everywhere (Imre)
- Fix warning for coffeelake on SunrisePoint PCH (Jiajia)
- Rework/Correction on minimum hblank calculation (Arun)
- Dmesg clean up (Jani)
- Add a couple of simple display workarounds (Ankit, Vinod)
- Refactor HDCP GSC (Jani)
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/aByyL3bEufPu79OM@intel.com
Drop the FDO_BUG_URL from the source, and stop suggesting to file bugs
on DPCD backlight issues. We don't do this anywhere else in display,
this isn't a special snowflake.
As a consequence, also drop the dependency on i915_utils.h from
intel_dp_aux_backlight.c.
Acked-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250429112534.2121656-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
According to our internal spec we need to now check if both
panel luminance and smooth brightness are available in panel for
us to be able to change brightness using luminance value.
--v2
-Add Fixes tag [Ankit]
Fixes: 6448149792 ("drm/i915/backlight: Check Luminance based brightness control for VESA")
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250411060235.2732060-3-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
With the primary goal of removing #include "i915_vma.h" from
intel_display_types.h, move intel_plane_ggtt_offset() to a proper
function in intel_atomic_plane.c. This reveals tons of implicit
dependencies all over the place that we pulled in via i915_vma.h. Fix
the fallout.
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/70ac6d19518f355abf37ac8c4b0f1d18878be28c.1740412806.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Modify backlight setup function for VESA interface to take into
account the nits based luminance.
--v2
-Prefer using luminance over nits [Jani]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ben Kao <ben.kao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206063253.2827017-8-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Create a function that fills in the value for
PANEL_TARGET_LUMINANCE_VALUE which helps in changing the luminance in
nits using VESA interface.
--v2
-Prefer using luminance over nits [Jani]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ben Kao <ben.kao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206063253.2827017-7-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Modify vesa_get_brightness function to take into account
luminance_control_support and based on that read the appropriate
register and return the value.
--v2
-Changes since we now use luminance instead of nits
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ben Kao <ben.kao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206063253.2827017-6-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Check if we are capable of controlling brightness via luminance
which is dependent on PANEL_LUMINANCE_CONTROL_CAPABLE bit being set
on EDP_GENERAL_CAPABILITY_2 register.
--v2
-Prefer using luminance rather than nits [Jani]
-Fix commit message
--v3
-Fix the bit name used in commit message [Arun]
-Use correct edp_dpcd[] to check the capability [Arun]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ben Kao <ben.kao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206063253.2827017-5-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
eDP is supposed to use VESA interface when using revision 1.5 and above,
use Intel interface for backlight control otherwise. Add check to
use correct interface.
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Tested-by: Ben Kao <ben.kao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20250206063253.2827017-4-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Now that we don't include i915_drv.h via any headers from display, we
can reliably remove unnecessary i915_drv.h includes and be sure they're
not indirectly included. Add other includes where needed.
v2: Fix 32-bit build
Reviewed-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20241217132147.2008057-1-jani.nikula@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
As of now whenerver HDR is switched on we use the PWM to change the
backlight as opposed to AUX based backlight changes in terms of nits.
This patch writes to the appropriate DPCD registers to enable aux
based backlight using values in nits.
--v2
-Fix max_cll and max_fall assignment [Jani]
-Fix the size sent in drm_dpcd_write [Jani]
--v3
-Content Luminance needs to be sent only for pre-ICL after that
it is directly picked up from hdr metadata [Ville]
--v4
-Add checks for HDR TCON cap bits [Ville]
-Check eotf of hdr_output_data and sets bits base of that value.
--v5
-Fix capability check bits.
-Check colorspace before setting BT2020
--v6
-Use intel_dp_has_gamut_dip to check if we have capability
to send sdp [Ville]
-Seprate filling of all hdr tcon related bits into it's
own function.
-Check eotf data to make sure we are in HDR mode [Sebastian]
--v7
-Fix confusion function name for hdr mode check [Jani]
-Fix the condition which tells us if we are in HDR mode or not
[Sebastian]
--v8
-Call fill_hdr_tcon_param unconditionally as some parameters may not
be dependent on the fact if we are in hdr mode or not [Sebastian]
-Fix some conditions after change in hdr mode check [Sebastian]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Wick <sebastian.wick@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240507040407.1056061-7-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Drop comments for EDP HDR DPCD registers as the code and
conditions will tell us what can be written where.
--v2
-Drop the comments altogether instead of just renaming them
[Sebastian]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240507040407.1056061-6-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Change INTEL_EDP_HDR_TCON_SDP_COLORIMETRY enable to
INTEL_EDP_HDR_TCON_SDP_OVERRIDE_AUX as this bit tells TCON to
ignore DPCD colorimetry values and take the one's sent through
SDP.
--v2
-Fix typo in commit message [Arun]
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240507040407.1056061-5-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Rename intel to intel cap which is present inside panel.edp struct
to make it more sensible to tell us what it contains.
Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Arun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240507040407.1056061-3-suraj.kandpal@intel.com
With multi panel machines becoming more prominent it's also
important to know which connector's backlight we're talking
about. Include that information in all the backlight debug/error
messages.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230215140021.2843-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
It's confusing to debug backlight issues when one can't
easily even tell what kind of backlight control was
selected. Sprinkle uniform debug messages to all the
backlight setup functions.
Also the one that was already there (ext_pwm) was
using drm_info() for some reason. I don't think that's
warranted so switch it to drm_dbg_kms() as well.
v2: Deal with AUX backlights too (Jani)
Move the VLV/CHV initial pipe debug there too (Jani)
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230215135616.30411-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Instead of using fixed 0 - 512 range use luminance range calculated
as a part of edid parsing. As a backup fall back to static 0 - 512.
v3: Clean-ups suggested by Jani Nikula
v2: Use values calculated during edid parsing
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220719095700.14923-4-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Move the panel specific VBT parsing to happen during the
output probing stage. Needs to be done because the VBT
parsing will need to look at the EDID to determine
the correct panel_type on some machines.
We split the parsed VBT data (i915->vbt) along the same
boundary. For the moment we just hoist all the panel
specific stuff into connector->panel.vbt since that seems
like the most convenient place for eg. the backlight code.
Note that we simply drop the drrs type check from
intel_drrs_frontbuffer_update() since that operates on the whole
device rather than a specific connector/encoder. But the check
was just a micro optimization so removing it doesn't actually
mattter for correctness.
TODO: Lot's of cleanup to be done in the future. Eg. most of
the DSI stuff could probably be eliminated entirely and just
parsed on demand during DSI init.
v2: Note the intel_drrs_frontbuffer_update() change
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220510104242.6099-13-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
We have now seen panel (XMG Core 15 e21 laptop) advertizing support
for Intel proprietary eDP backlight control via DPCD registers, but
actually working only with legacy pwm control.
This patch adds panel EDID check for possible HDR static metadata and
Intel proprietary eDP backlight control is used only if that exists.
Missing HDR static metadata is ignored if user specifically asks for
Intel proprietary eDP backlight control via enable_dpcd_backlight
parameter.
v2 :
- Ignore missing HDR static metadata if Intel proprietary eDP
backlight control is forced via i915.enable_dpcd_backlight
- Printout info message if panel is missing HDR static metadata and
support for Intel proprietary eDP backlight control is detected
Fixes: 4a8d79901d ("drm/i915/dp: Enable Intel's HDR backlight interface (only SDR for now)")
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5284
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Filippo Falezza <filippo.falezza@outlook.it>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220413082826.120634-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
While working on supporting the Intel HDR backlight interface, I noticed
that there's a couple of laptops that will very rarely manage to boot up
without detecting Intel HDR backlight support - even though it's supported
on the system. One example of such a laptop is the Lenovo P17 1st
generation.
Following some investigation Ville Syrjälä did through the docs they have
available to them, they discovered that there's actually supposed to be a
30ms wait after writing the source OUI before we begin setting up the rest
of the backlight interface.
This seems to be correct, as adding this 30ms delay seems to have
completely fixed the probing issues I was previously seeing. So - let's
start performing a 30ms wait after writing the OUI, which we do in a manner
similar to how we keep track of PPS delays (e.g. record the timestamp of
the OUI write, and then wait for however many ms are left since that
timestamp right before we interact with the backlight) in order to avoid
waiting any longer then we need to. As well, this also avoids us performing
this delay on systems where we don't end up using the HDR backlight
interface.
V3:
* Move last_oui_write into intel_dp
V2:
* Move panel delays into intel_pps
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Fixes: 4a8d79901d ("drm/i915/dp: Enable Intel's HDR backlight interface (only SDR for now)")
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.12+
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211130212912.212044-1-lyude@redhat.com
Hooray! We've managed to hit enough bugs upstream that I've been able to
come up with a pretty solid explanation for how backlight controls are
actually supposed to be detected and used these days. As well, having the
rest of the PWM bits in VESA's backlight interface implemented seems to
have fixed all of the problematic brightness controls laptop panels that
we've hit so far.
So, let's actually document this instead of just calling the laptop panels
liars. As well, I would like to formally apologize to all of the laptop
panels I called liars. I'm sorry laptop panels, hopefully you can all
forgive me and we can move past this~
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211105183342.130810-6-lyude@redhat.com
Now that we've added support to i915 for controlling panel backlights that
need PWM to be enabled/disabled, let's finalize this and add support for
controlling brightness levels via PWM as well. This should hopefully put us
towards the path of supporting _ALL_ backlights via VESA's DPCD interface
which would allow us to finally start trusting the DPCD again.
Note however that we still don't enable using this by default on i915 when
it's not needed, primarily because I haven't yet had a chance to confirm if
it's safe to do this on the one machine in Intel's CI that had an issue
with this: samus-fi-bdw. I have done basic testing of this on other
machines though, by manually patching i915 to force it into PWM-only mode
on some of my laptops.
v2:
* Correct documentation (thanks Doug!)
* Get rid of backlight caps
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Rajeev Nandan <rajeevny@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Satadru Pramanik <satadru@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211105183342.130810-5-lyude@redhat.com
This simply adds proper support for panel backlights that can be controlled
via VESA's backlight control protocol, but which also require that we
enable and disable the backlight via PWM instead of via the DPCD interface.
We also enable this by default, in order to fix some people's backlights
that were broken by not having this enabled.
For reference, backlights that require this and use VESA's backlight
interface tend to be laptops with hybrid GPUs, but this very well may
change in the future.
v4:
* Make sure that we call intel_backlight_level_to_pwm() in
intel_dp_aux_vesa_enable_backlight() - vsyrjala
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3680
Fixes: fe7d52bcca ("drm/i915/dp: Don't use DPCD backlights that need PWM enable/disable")
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.12+
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211105183342.130810-2-lyude@redhat.com
Since we're about to implement eDP backlight support in nouveau using the
standard protocol from VESA, we might as well just take the code that's
already written for this and move it into a set of shared DRM helpers.
Note that these helpers are intended to handle DPCD related backlight
control bits such as setting the brightness level over AUX, probing the
backlight's TCON, enabling/disabling the backlight over AUX if supported,
etc. Any PWM-related portions of backlight control are explicitly left up
to the driver, as these will vary from platform to platform.
The only exception to this is the calculation of the PWM frequency
pre-divider value. This is because the only platform-specific information
required for this is the PWM frequency of the panel, which the driver is
expected to provide if available. The actual algorithm for calculating this
value is standard and is defined in the eDP specification from VESA.
Note that these helpers do not yet implement the full range of features
the VESA backlight interface provides, and only provide the following
functionality (all of which was already present in i915's DPCD backlight
support):
* Basic control of brightness levels
* Basic probing of backlight capabilities
* Helpers for enabling and disabling the backlight
v3:
* Split out changes to i915's backlight code to separate patches to make it
easier to review
v4:
* Style/spelling changes from Thomas Zimmermann
v5:
* Start using new drm_dbg_*() functions
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: greg.depoire@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210514181504.565252-9-lyude@redhat.com
Also, stop printing the DPCD register that failed, and just describe it
instead. Saves us from having to look up each register offset when reading
through kernel logs (plus, DPCD dumping with drm.debug |= 0x100 will give
us that anyway).
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210514181504.565252-8-lyude@redhat.com
If we can't read DP_EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT in
intel_dp_aux_vesa_calc_max_backlight() but do have a valid PWM frequency
defined in the VBT, we'll keep going in the function until we inevitably
fail on reading DP_EDP_PWMGEN_BIT_COUNT_CAP_MIN. There's not much point in
doing this, so just return early.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210514181504.565252-7-lyude@redhat.com
Since we're about to be moving this code into shared DRM helpers, we might
as well start to cache certain backlight capabilities that can be
determined from the EDP DPCD, and are likely to be relevant to the majority
of drivers using said helpers. The main purpose of this is just to prevent
every driver from having to check everything against the eDP DPCD using DP
macros, which makes the code slightly easier to read (especially since the
names of some of the eDP capabilities don't exactly match up with what we
actually need to use them for, like DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_BRIGHTNESS_BYTE_COUNT
for instance).
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210514181504.565252-5-lyude@redhat.com
Get rid of the extraneous switch case in here, and just open code
edp_backlight_mode as we only ever use it once.
v4:
* Check that backlight mode is DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_CONTROL_MODE_DPCD, not
DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_CONTROL_MODE_MASK - imirkin
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210514181504.565252-4-lyude@redhat.com
This is kind of an annoying aspect of DRM's DP helpers:
drm_dp_dpcd_readb/writeb() return the size of bytes read/written on
success, thus we want to check against that instead of checking if the
return value is less than 0.
I'll probably be fixing this in the near future once I start doing DP work
again, also because I'd rather not mix a tree-wide refactor like that in
with a patch series intended to be around introducing DP backlight helpers.
So, for now let's just handle the return values from each function
correctly.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210514181504.565252-3-lyude@redhat.com
Noticed this while moving all of the VESA backlight code in i915 over to
DRM helpers: it would appear that we calculate the frequency value we want
to write to DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_FREQ_SET twice even though this value never
actually changes during runtime. So, let's simplify things by just caching
this value in intel_panel.backlight, and re-writing it as-needed.
Changes since v1:
* Wrap panel->backlight.edp.vesa.pwm_freq_pre_divider in
DP_EDP_BACKLIGHT_FREQ_AUX_SET_CAP check - Jani
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: greg.depoire@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210514181504.565252-2-lyude@redhat.com
Looks like that there actually are another subset of laptops on the market
that don't support the Intel HDR backlight interface, but do advertise
support for the VESA DPCD backlight interface despite the fact it doesn't
seem to work.
Note though I'm not entirely clear on this - on one of the machines where
this issue was observed, I also noticed that we appeared to be rejecting
the VBT defined backlight frequency in
intel_dp_aux_vesa_calc_max_backlight(). It's noted in this function that:
/* Use highest possible value of Pn for more granularity of brightness
* adjustment while satifying the conditions below.
* ...
* - FxP is within 25% of desired value.
* Note: 25% is arbitrary value and may need some tweak.
*/
So it's possible that this value might just need to be tweaked, but for now
let's just disable the VESA backlight interface unless it's specified in
the VBT just to be safe. We might be able to try enabling this again by
default in the future.
Fixes: 2227816e64 ("drm/i915/dp: Allow forcing specific interfaces through enable_dpcd_backlight")
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3169
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210318170204.513000-1-lyude@redhat.com
We haven't yet implemented support for backlights that need to be
enabled/disabled via PWM instead of AUX, which means we'll break things if
we enable DPCD backlight control on these machines. Luckily though since
most of these machines work fine just using the plain PWM backlight
controls anyway, there shouldn't be any issue with just leaving DPCD
backlight controls disabled in such situations.
This should fix the issues with PWM being left on that were being observed
on fi-bdw-samus.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: 4a8d79901d ("drm/i915/dp: Enable Intel's HDR backlight interface (only SDR for now)")
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_suspend/basic-s0 # fi-bdw-samus
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210121183644.2627282-1-lyude@redhat.com
Since we now support controlling panel backlights through DPCD using
both the standard VESA interface, and Intel's proprietary HDR backlight
interface, we should allow the user to be able to explicitly choose
between one or the other in the event that we're wrong about panels
reliably reporting support for the Intel HDR interface.
So, this commit adds support for this by introducing two new
enable_dpcd_backlight options: 2 which forces i915 to only probe for the
VESA interface, and 3 which forces i915 to only probe for the Intel
backlight interface (might be useful if we find panels in the wild that
report the VESA interface in their VBT, but actually only support the
Intel backlight interface).
v3:
* Rebase
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: thaytan@noraisin.net
Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114221709.2261452-5-lyude@redhat.com
So-recently a bunch of laptops on the market have started using DPCD
backlight controls instead of the traditional DDI backlight controls.
Originally we thought we had this handled by adding VESA backlight
control support to i915, but the story ended up being a lot more
complicated then that.
Simply put-there's two main backlight interfaces Intel can see in the
wild. Intel's proprietary HDR backlight interface, and the standard VESA
backlight interface. Note that many panels have been observed to report
support for both backlight interfaces, but testing has shown far more
panels work with the Intel HDR backlight interface at the moment.
Additionally, the VBT appears to be capable of reporting support for the
VESA backlight interface but not the Intel HDR interface which needs to
be probed by setting the right magic OUI.
On top of that however, there's also actually two different variants of
the Intel HDR backlight interface. The first uses the AUX channel for
controlling the brightness of the screen in both SDR and HDR mode, and
the second only uses the AUX channel for setting the brightness level in
HDR mode - relying on PWM for setting the brightness level in SDR mode.
For the time being we've been using EDIDs to maintain a list of quirks
for panels that safely do support the VESA backlight interface. Adding
support for Intel's HDR backlight interface in addition however, should
finally allow us to auto-detect eDP backlight controls properly so long
as we probe like so:
* If the panel's VBT reports VESA backlight support, assume it really
does support it
* If the panel's VBT reports DDI backlight controls:
* First probe for Intel's HDR backlight interface
* If that fails, probe for VESA's backlight interface
* If that fails, assume no DPCD backlight control
* If the panel's VBT reports any other backlight type: just assume it
doesn't have DPCD backlight controls
Changes since v4:
* Fix checkpatch issues
Changes since v3:
* Stop using drm_device and use drm_i915_private instead
* Don't forget to return from intel_dp_aux_hdr_get_backlight() if we fail
to read the current backlight mode from the DPCD
* s/uint8_t/u8/
* Remove unneeded parenthesis in intel_dp_aux_hdr_enable_backlight()
* Use drm_dbg_kms() in intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs()
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: thaytan@noraisin.net
Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114221709.2261452-4-lyude@redhat.com
In the next commit where we split PWM related backlight functions from
higher-level backlight functions, we'll want to be able to retrieve the
backlight level for the current display panel from the
intel_panel_bl_funcs->setup() function using pwm_funcs->get(). Since
intel_panel_bl_funcs->setup() is called before we've fully read in the
current hardware state into our atomic state, we can't grab atomic
modesetting locks safely anyway in intel_panel_bl_funcs->setup(), and some
PWM backlight functions (vlv_get_backlight() in particular) require knowing
the currently used pipe we need to be able to discern the current display
pipe through other means. Luckily, we're already passing the current
display pipe to intel_panel_bl_funcs->setup() so all we have to do in order
to achieve this is pass down that parameter to intel_panel_bl_funcs->get().
So, fix this by accepting an additional pipe parameter in
intel_panel_bl_funcs->get(), and leave figuring out the current display
pipe up to the caller.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210114221709.2261452-2-lyude@redhat.com
No functional changes yet, this just adds definitions for all of the
known DPCD registers used by Intel's HDR backlight interface. Since
we'll only ever use this in i915, we just define them in
intel_dp_aux_backlight.c
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: thaytan@noraisin.net
Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201204223603.249878-7-lyude@redhat.com
Since we're about to add support for a second type of backlight control
interface over DP AUX (specifically, Intel's proprietary HDR backlight
controls) let's rename all of the current backlight hooks we have for
vesa to make it clear that they're specific to the VESA interface and
not Intel's.
v3:
* Rebase
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: thaytan@noraisin.net
Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201204223603.249878-6-lyude@redhat.com
Instead of using intel_panel->backlight.level, have the caller provide us
with the current panel backlight value. We'll need this for when we
separate PWM-related backlight callbacks from other means of backlight
control (like DPCD backlight controls), as the caller of each PWM callback
will be responsible for converting the current brightness value to it's
respective PWM level.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20201204223603.249878-4-lyude@redhat.com
Dave Airlie
Jani Nikula
Suraj Kandpal
Jouni Högander
Ville Syrjälä
Lyude Paul