We have differing implementations for display runtime pm in i915 and xe
drivers. Add struct of function pointers into display_parent_interface
which will contain used implementation of runtime pm.
v2:
- add _interface suffix to rpm function pointer struct
- add struct ref_tracker forward declaration
- use kernel-doc comments
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251030202836.1815680-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Let's gradually start calling i915 and xe parent, or core, drivers from
display via function pointers passed at display probe.
Going forward, the struct intel_display_parent_interface is expected to
include const pointers to sub-structs by functionality, for example:
struct intel_display_rpm {
struct ref_tracker *(*get)(struct drm_device *drm);
/* ... */
};
struct intel_display_parent_interface {
/* ... */
const struct intel_display_rpm *rpm;
};
This is a baby step towards not building display as part of both i915
and xe drivers, but rather making it an independent driver interfacing
with the two.
v3: useless include additions dropped
v2: unrelated include removal dropped
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251030202836.1815680-2-jouni.hogander@intel.com
Jouni Högander
Jani Nikula