mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
vsock: fix lock inversion in vsock_assign_transport()
Syzbot reported a potential lock inversion deadlock between vsock_register_mutex and sk_lock-AF_VSOCK when vsock_linger() is called. The issue was introduced by commit687aa0c558("vsock: Fix transport_* TOCTOU") which added vsock_register_mutex locking in vsock_assign_transport() around the transport->release() call, that can call vsock_linger(). vsock_assign_transport() can be called with sk_lock held. vsock_linger() calls sk_wait_event() that temporarily releases and re-acquires sk_lock. During this window, if another thread hold vsock_register_mutex while trying to acquire sk_lock, a circular dependency is created. Fix this by releasing vsock_register_mutex before calling transport->release() and vsock_deassign_transport(). This is safe because we don't need to hold vsock_register_mutex while releasing the old transport, and we ensure the new transport won't disappear by obtaining a module reference first via try_module_get(). Reported-by: syzbot+10e35716f8e4929681fa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Tested-by: syzbot+10e35716f8e4929681fa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes:687aa0c558("vsock: Fix transport_* TOCTOU") Cc: mhal@rbox.co Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251021121718.137668-1-sgarzare@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
df890ceeb2
commit
f7c877e753
|
|
@ -487,12 +487,26 @@ int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)
|
||||||
goto err;
|
goto err;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (vsk->transport) {
|
if (vsk->transport && vsk->transport == new_transport) {
|
||||||
if (vsk->transport == new_transport) {
|
ret = 0;
|
||||||
ret = 0;
|
goto err;
|
||||||
goto err;
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/* We increase the module refcnt to prevent the transport unloading
|
||||||
|
* while there are open sockets assigned to it.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
if (!new_transport || !try_module_get(new_transport->module)) {
|
||||||
|
ret = -ENODEV;
|
||||||
|
goto err;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/* It's safe to release the mutex after a successful try_module_get().
|
||||||
|
* Whichever transport `new_transport` points at, it won't go away until
|
||||||
|
* the last module_put() below or in vsock_deassign_transport().
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
mutex_unlock(&vsock_register_mutex);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (vsk->transport) {
|
||||||
/* transport->release() must be called with sock lock acquired.
|
/* transport->release() must be called with sock lock acquired.
|
||||||
* This path can only be taken during vsock_connect(), where we
|
* This path can only be taken during vsock_connect(), where we
|
||||||
* have already held the sock lock. In the other cases, this
|
* have already held the sock lock. In the other cases, this
|
||||||
|
|
@ -512,20 +526,6 @@ int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)
|
||||||
vsk->peer_shutdown = 0;
|
vsk->peer_shutdown = 0;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* We increase the module refcnt to prevent the transport unloading
|
|
||||||
* while there are open sockets assigned to it.
|
|
||||||
*/
|
|
||||||
if (!new_transport || !try_module_get(new_transport->module)) {
|
|
||||||
ret = -ENODEV;
|
|
||||||
goto err;
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* It's safe to release the mutex after a successful try_module_get().
|
|
||||||
* Whichever transport `new_transport` points at, it won't go away until
|
|
||||||
* the last module_put() below or in vsock_deassign_transport().
|
|
||||||
*/
|
|
||||||
mutex_unlock(&vsock_register_mutex);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_SEQPACKET) {
|
if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_SEQPACKET) {
|
||||||
if (!new_transport->seqpacket_allow ||
|
if (!new_transport->seqpacket_allow ||
|
||||||
!new_transport->seqpacket_allow(remote_cid)) {
|
!new_transport->seqpacket_allow(remote_cid)) {
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue