mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
Documentation: Fix power typos
Fix typos. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250813200526.290420-8-helgaas@kernel.org
This commit is contained in:
parent
e855d7e5e2
commit
3dae66aec6
|
|
@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ in the device tree from the root bridge to a leaf device contains both of them).
|
|||
The pci_pm_suspend_noirq() routine is executed after suspend_device_irqs() has
|
||||
been called, which means that the device driver's interrupt handler won't be
|
||||
invoked while this routine is running. It first checks if the device's driver
|
||||
implements legacy PCI suspends routines (Section 3), in which case the legacy
|
||||
implements legacy PCI suspend routines (Section 3), in which case the legacy
|
||||
late suspend routine is called and its result is returned (the standard
|
||||
configuration registers of the device are saved if the driver's callback hasn't
|
||||
done that). Second, if the device driver's struct dev_pm_ops object is not
|
||||
|
|
@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ result is then returned).
|
|||
The resume phase is carried out asynchronously for PCI devices, like the
|
||||
suspend phase described above, which means that if two PCI devices don't depend
|
||||
on each other in a known way, the pci_pm_resume() routine may be executed for
|
||||
the both of them in parallel.
|
||||
both of them in parallel.
|
||||
|
||||
The pci_pm_complete() routine only executes the device driver's pm->complete()
|
||||
callback, if defined.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ infrastructure uses it internally? And where do they share common code?
|
|||
|
||||
Well, a picture is worth a thousand words... So ASCII art follows :-)
|
||||
|
||||
[This depicts the current design in the kernel, and focusses only on the
|
||||
[This depicts the current design in the kernel, and focuses only on the
|
||||
interactions involving the freezer and CPU hotplug and also tries to explain
|
||||
the locking involved. It outlines the notifications involved as well.
|
||||
But please note that here, only the call paths are illustrated, with the aim
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue