mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
ASoC: codecs: wm8955: use snd_kcontrol_chip() instead of snd_soc_kcontrol_component()
We have very similar name functions (A)(B). Both gets component from snd_kcontrol, but (A) is used in callback functions which is registered through snd_soc_add_component_controls(), (B) is used through snd_soc_dapm_new_widgets(). (A) snd_soc_kcontrol_component() (B) snd_soc_dapm_kcontrol_component() (B) is using very picky way to get component but using it is necessary in ASoC. But (A) is just wrapper function to snd_kcontrol_chip(), and directly using it without wrapper is very common way on ALSA. To reduce confusions of similar function, let's use common way on (A). Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/87h5w2nm6q.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
161e3c824e
commit
1a1a66c2ce
|
|
@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static int wm8955_set_deemph(struct snd_soc_component *component)
|
|||
static int wm8955_get_deemph(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
|
||||
struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
|
||||
struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
|
||||
struct wm8955_priv *wm8955 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
|
||||
|
||||
ucontrol->value.integer.value[0] = wm8955->deemph;
|
||||
|
|
@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ static int wm8955_get_deemph(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
|
|||
static int wm8955_put_deemph(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
|
||||
struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_soc_kcontrol_component(kcontrol);
|
||||
struct snd_soc_component *component = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
|
||||
struct wm8955_priv *wm8955 = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
|
||||
unsigned int deemph = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0];
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue