mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
selftests: harness: fix printing of mismatch values in __EXPECT()
intptr_t and uintptr_t are not big enough types on 32-bit architectures
when printing 64-bit values, resulting to the following incorrect
diagnostic output:
# get_syscall_info.c:209:get_syscall_info:Expected exp_args[2] (3134324433) == info.entry.args[1] (3134324433)
Replace intptr_t and uintptr_t with intmax_t and uintmax_t, respectively.
With this fix, the same test produces more usable diagnostic output:
# get_syscall_info.c:209:get_syscall_info:Expected exp_args[2] (3134324433) == info.entry.args[1] (18446744072548908753)
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250108170757.GA6723@strace.io
Fixes: b5bb6d3068 ("selftests/seccomp: fix 32-bit build warnings")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@strace.io>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b6f9cd83c6
commit
02bc220dc6
|
|
@ -760,33 +760,33 @@
|
|||
/* Report with actual signedness to avoid weird output. */ \
|
||||
switch (is_signed_type(__exp) * 2 + is_signed_type(__seen)) { \
|
||||
case 0: { \
|
||||
unsigned long long __exp_print = (uintptr_t)__exp; \
|
||||
unsigned long long __seen_print = (uintptr_t)__seen; \
|
||||
__TH_LOG("Expected %s (%llu) %s %s (%llu)", \
|
||||
uintmax_t __exp_print = (uintmax_t)__exp; \
|
||||
uintmax_t __seen_print = (uintmax_t)__seen; \
|
||||
__TH_LOG("Expected %s (%ju) %s %s (%ju)", \
|
||||
_expected_str, __exp_print, #_t, \
|
||||
_seen_str, __seen_print); \
|
||||
break; \
|
||||
} \
|
||||
case 1: { \
|
||||
unsigned long long __exp_print = (uintptr_t)__exp; \
|
||||
long long __seen_print = (intptr_t)__seen; \
|
||||
__TH_LOG("Expected %s (%llu) %s %s (%lld)", \
|
||||
uintmax_t __exp_print = (uintmax_t)__exp; \
|
||||
intmax_t __seen_print = (intmax_t)__seen; \
|
||||
__TH_LOG("Expected %s (%ju) %s %s (%jd)", \
|
||||
_expected_str, __exp_print, #_t, \
|
||||
_seen_str, __seen_print); \
|
||||
break; \
|
||||
} \
|
||||
case 2: { \
|
||||
long long __exp_print = (intptr_t)__exp; \
|
||||
unsigned long long __seen_print = (uintptr_t)__seen; \
|
||||
__TH_LOG("Expected %s (%lld) %s %s (%llu)", \
|
||||
intmax_t __exp_print = (intmax_t)__exp; \
|
||||
uintmax_t __seen_print = (uintmax_t)__seen; \
|
||||
__TH_LOG("Expected %s (%jd) %s %s (%ju)", \
|
||||
_expected_str, __exp_print, #_t, \
|
||||
_seen_str, __seen_print); \
|
||||
break; \
|
||||
} \
|
||||
case 3: { \
|
||||
long long __exp_print = (intptr_t)__exp; \
|
||||
long long __seen_print = (intptr_t)__seen; \
|
||||
__TH_LOG("Expected %s (%lld) %s %s (%lld)", \
|
||||
intmax_t __exp_print = (intmax_t)__exp; \
|
||||
intmax_t __seen_print = (intmax_t)__seen; \
|
||||
__TH_LOG("Expected %s (%jd) %s %s (%jd)", \
|
||||
_expected_str, __exp_print, #_t, \
|
||||
_seen_str, __seen_print); \
|
||||
break; \
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue